1720 items matching your search terms
LYNETTE MELVILLE V AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 85 [12 July 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 85 ARC 18/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN LYNETTE MELVILLE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 22 December 2010 and 2 February 2011 Judgment: 12 July 2011 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] In my judgment 1 of 8 July 2010, I reserved co...
...good conscience. This includes the exercise of its discretion to award costs. In appropriate cases, this may require an issue by issue approach. [7] Mr Sharp’s second submission was based on the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305 and, presumably, paragraph [48] of that judgment in particular. It seems to me that Mr Sharp’s submission takes what the Court of Appeal said there somewhat out of context. What was said...
...meeting at a charge out rate of $300 per hour. Mr Caisley spent 17.6 hours and Ms Larmer 12.8 hours on the matter. It was submitted that those costs were reasonable. [6] As to the costs in the Court, Mr Caisley referred to cases such as Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] 1 ERNZ 305 (CA) and Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd [2002] 1 ERNZ 438 (CA) and contended that the starting point of 66 percent of actual and reasonable costs of the successful party can be regarded a...
...Pacific Council of Youth and Children’s Courts Fifteen Point Assessment of a Youth Justice System A. Introduction This document emerged following the 18th meeting of the South Pacific Council of Youth and Children’s Courts (SPCYCC) in Auckland, New Zealand. The meeting identified a need for an assessment tool which could assist the Council to determine the needs and current status of the youth justice systems of countries/states in the South Pacific. The fifteen points i...
...claim on the grounds that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction by reason of the fact that the Health and Disability Commissioner has not found a breach of the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers’ Rights (Code of Rights). [2] In Mackrell v Universal College of Learning High Court Palmerston North CIV2005- 485-802, 17 August 2005 at [48] Wild J held that the Tribunal has a wide discretionary power to strike out or to dismiss a proceeding brought before it and the exercise of this...
...[1] In a decision dated 16 December 2010, the Tribunal upheld a complaint. [2] The facts and background are set out in the earlier decision. [2.1] The Adviser made a representation she held a Master of Business Administration Degree, from the University of Auckland. This representation was made on two websites: [2.1.1] www.visaexpress.co.nz [2.1.2] http://bbs.skykiwi.com [2.2] Those websites were used to promote the Adviser’s professional services. The Adviser had the intentio...
...Ltd and 9 New Zealand Engineering Coachbuilding, Aircraft, Motor and Related Trades Industrial Union of Workers v Court of Arbitration [1976] 2 NZLR 283 (CA) at 284-285. 10 Coroners Court v Newton [2006] NZAR 312 (CA) at [44]. 11 Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305 (CA). 12 Curtis v Commonwealth of Australia [2019] NZCA 126. concluded it was appropriate to follow the principle identified by the Court of Appeal.13 [20] I proceed on the ba...
...Support to victims of serious crime (Victims Assistance Scheme financial grants) • Support to victims of crime through the provision of 24-hour emergency support and assistance • Victims of crime information phone line Victoria University Research and -Te Ngapera development of Centre for restoratbLe Restorative practices Practice ~0 [v'v«) ~ Coverage services funded review National Service, Manawato Whanganui - all areas National General p...
...Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY S Pezaro - Deputy Chair K Williams - Member C Joe - Member Hearing at AUCKLAND on 16 January 2019 Appearances The appellant in person P Suieva for the Ministry of Social Development DECISION Background [1] XXXX (“the appellant”) appeals the decisions of 30 May 2017 to suspend payment of...
Ministry of Justice Te Manatu Ture Discussion Paper Re-evaluation of the Human Rights Protections in New Zealand RE-EVALUATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTIONS IN NEW ZEALAND REPORT FOR THE ASSOCIATE MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL HON. MARGARET WILSON 3 DISCLAIMER The Ministerial Re-evaluation of Human Rights Protections in New Zealand was written by an independent evaluation team for the Minister of Justice. The views expressed in it are those of the independent evalua