Search Results

1. Auckland 356 Complaints Committee and Auckland No. 1 Standards Committee v Sanders [2010] NZLCDT 21 [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...authorising document itself, so its actual date was not relevant to the central issue of authority to transfer. 1 For Mr Sanders it had been submitted at the hearing that Exhibit A on Mr Sanders’ affidavit, filed with the Tribunal in his response to the charges, constituted a record of his instruction or authority to make the transfer. During the hearing counsel for Mr Sanders accepted that the file note concerned did not accurately r...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - Wai 2522 2.5.0019 TPPA [pdf, 814 KB]

   ...architecture, content of and terminology used in the TPP but, prior to the evidence of experts commissioned by parties, should not provide preliminary opinions on matters to be addressed in the inquiry; 32.2 the experts commissioned by parties would provide affidavits setting out their analysis of the issues and the agreed scenarios. In the 5 current circumstance, given that both Or Ridings and Professor Kelsey have given extensive thought and preparation to these matters, it is a...

3. July 2013 Criminal Fee Schedules [pdf, 397 KB]

   ...(s33(3)(b) Criminal Disclosure Act 2008) $350 For:  Taking instructions, attending the client  Receiving and reviewing disclosure  Identifying legal and factual issues  Preparing and filing notice of appeal  Preparing affidavits  Undertaking research  Liaising with Crown, prosecution  Considering Crown, prosecution submissions  Preparing submissions for hearing  Interviewing/cross examining witnesses  Liaising with the High Court...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 141 Savage v Wai Shing Ltd [pdf, 484 KB]

   ...Ports of Auckland Ltd v Findlay.3 The application for the interim injunction was therefore dismissed. [7] Mr Savage promptly brought a non-de novo challenge to the Court for which urgency was granted. Prior to the hearing, the parties filed affidavits and submissions. A telephone submissions-only hearing took place on 8 October 2019. [8] Because the challenge was brought on a non-de novo basis, I made a direction at the outset of the hearing that the nature and scope of the h...

5. [2023] NZEnvC 095 Country Lifestyles Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 428 KB]

   ...considers that indemnity costs are justified in relation to its expert costs on the basis that the Council shouldered the burden of providing key evidence relevant to Mr Wedd’s declaration proceedings. For example: Although Mr Wedd provided affidavits in support of the declarations from Mr Colin Selman and Ms Lisa Clapperton, a horticulturalist, Ms Clapperton’s affidavit only addressed vegetation present within the path of the proposed track.26 Ms Clapperton’s affidavit did n...

6. Watson v Day - Proprietors of Torere 64 Incorporation [2024] Māori Appellate Court MB 183 (2024 APPEAL 183) [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...chairperson of the Committee of Management to respond to issues raised as to non- compliance.” The explanation was to be filed no later than 25 August 2023.2 [7] On 24 August 2023 Stephen Franklin, counsel acting for the Incorporation, filed affidavits from Frederick Cookson and Russell Mio which, amongst other matters, purported to provide evidence discrediting the audit report filed by Mr Watson. The affidavits also sought to explain the reasons why the COM had continued in offi...

7. Meroiti v Meroiti - Owhata No 1J No 2B [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 142 (2025 APPEAL 142) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...Court may hear the application after reasonable notice of the application has been given to the parties. [21] Rule 9.6 is headed “Urgent application for injunction.” The first requirement is that an urgent application is accompanied by an affidavit or statutory declaration verifying the facts stated in the application and setting out the reasons for urgency. The applicant is also required, on the same day the application is filed, to send the respondent by ordinary post a copy...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 129 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 7 MB]

   ...also sought a further declaration as to the unlawfulness of a proposed agreement between the Regional Council and Amuri Irrigation Company Limited ('Amuri'). That part of its application was opposed by Amuri and also opposed by the Council : Affidavit of A Barton, dated 2 May 2018; Affidavits of P Skelton, CHart, N Dommisse and I Whitehouse, dated 3 May 2018. That part of the applicat ion was then withdrawn , prompting Amuri to withdraw from the proceeding. Three other s274 parti...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 35 Yang v LE Builders Ltd [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...a memorandum addressing these deficiencies which counsel did promptly. [6] Although I have some residual doubts about the efficacy of the plaintiff’s proposed orders, ultimately that is a matter for him and I make the following orders: By affidavit to be filed and served no later than 20 April 2011, Lawrence Leong Eng Loo is to identify by name the person present with him at the time the original of the tax code declaration, a copy of which is attached to the memorandum filed b...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 105 Mason Engineers (NZ) Ltd v Hodgson [pdf, 49 KB]

    ...its losses as it must if it is to seek judgment. (b) I require a without notice application for directions as to service to accompany the amended statement of claim when it is filed. If the plaintiff considers it appropriate, that may include affidavit evidence but it must, in any event, include a memorandum from counsel addressing the defendant’s current legal status (as referred to earlier) and what directions should be given for service of the amended statement of claim on t...