[2022] NZEmpC 119 H v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 175 KB]
...required to deal with a misguided application that had substantially and unnecessarily added to RPW’s costs.7 [8] Mr Hood’s second submission in support of an uplift was that H had taken steps without obtaining leave. He was referring to H filing affidavits outside the parameters of the timetabled directions necessitating a further telephone directions conference and related attendances. [9] The third ground relied on was that H made extremely serious but unsubstantiated all...