Search Results

1. Changes to legal aid criminal fees schedules review - responses & final decisions [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   Legal Services Commissioner Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street | DX SX10125 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 lsc@justice.govt.nz www.legalservicescommissioner.govt.nz Criminal Legal Aid: Changes to Fees Schedules – Review Responses and Final Decisions 2 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all

2. Hall v Opepe Farm Trust (2010) 19 Waiariki MB 258 (19 WAR 258) [pdf, 442 KB]

   ...2009 His Honour Judge P J Savage held a teleconference with the parties. Judge Carter issued timetabling directions and referred the application to the resident judge for hearing. 8 He issued further timetabling directions for the filing of affidavits and set the matter down for another teleconference to be held on 22 July 2009. The application was then referred back to Judge Carter for a further conference in the absence of Judge Savage.9 [18] Following a teleconference held on...

3. [2011] NZEmpC 31 Ravnjak v Wellington International Airport Ltd [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...admissibility issues to the Court for decision under s 178 of the Employment Relations Act. [8] By consent, I have taken account of a number of documents as well as legal submissions made by counsel. In addition I received (without objection) the affidavit evidence of an expert witness for the plaintiff relevant to the surveillance question. The documents considered include the statement of problem and statement in reply in the Employment Relations Authority, the witness stateme...

4. Brown v REAA & Wealleans [2011] NZREADT 42 [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...November 2006 Mrs Mary Wealleans and her husband attended a seminar given by L J Hooker Development Services (trading as City Investment Services Limited) in Hamilton. This was a seminar given by Hookers about property investment. Her evidence (in an affidavit dated 8 August 2011) was that at this seminar she received a brochure promoting property investment in Auckland. At the end of this seminar she made an appointment for a property consultant called Richard Phelan to visit her and...

5. Ngamoki-Cameron - The Proprietors of Mangaroa (2015) 119 Waiariki MB 225 (119 WAR 225) [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...$ Total Combined Total Email from Savage with direction of Judge 10 min 50.00 Further email from Savage and service of application and documents 10 min 50.00 Perusal of application (5p) 20 min 100.00 Perusal of Bridget Rika affidavit (37p) 2 600.00 Perusal of Mate Webb affidavit (12p) 1 300.00 Perusal of Chris Insley affidavit (51p) 4 1,200.00 Receipt of judgment (13p) 1 300.00 Preparing opposing affidavit of Carl Ngamoki-Cameron (110p) 16 4,8...

6. CAC10070 v Adams [2012] NZREADT 5 [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...from Mr Harriman stating that her inclusion in the purchasing entity (the JMAR Trust) was an error on his part as Ms Adams had only ever intended to be a lender of finance and not a purchaser. This claim was repeated at subsequent meetings and in affidavits and statements filed with the CAC. [14] The CAC alleged that there was an agreement between Ms Adams and Mr Harriman proximate to the auction of 19 Palmer Crescent on (8 September 2010) that they would be involved together in the...

7. Saffioti & Anor v Ward & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 24 [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...2011 after it had instructed solicitors. Mr and Mrs Saffioti opposed JSAL’s application. [14] JSAL filed memoranda in support of its removal application on 18 October, 1 December 2011 and 29 February 2012. Mr and Mrs Saffioti filed an affidavit sworn by Mr Saffioti on 8 November and opposing memoranda on 22 November 2011 and 24 February 2012. It is not necessary to record the content of those memoranda in any detail apart from the following material: (a) Mr Saffioti’s...

8. Langhorne v ACC [2010] NZACA 11 [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...simply ignoring her requests to cooperate with the proposed late filing. [28] Moreover, ACC had ample proof, through the appellant’s ongoing case management, of her incapacity in terms of both the ability to appeal within time and to swear an affidavit in support of her application and ACC’s insistence upon a supporting affidavit as to her circumstances before it would consider consenting to the late application to appeal was gratuitous and oppressive. [29] Moreover, ACC had b...

9. TU v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 67 (8 October 2013) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...to which he was not entitled (in breach of s 44(2)(d) of the Act). [48.5] The complaint would be upheld pursuant to section 44(2)(d) and (e) of the Act. Oral hearing [49] In the course of a series of interlocutory steps (with the parties filing affidavits and other documents), the Tribunal determined that there should be an oral hearing, which is not usual. The interlocutory process is recorded in minutes, and it is not necessary to detail the steps. In essence the purpose of the oral...

10. [2018] NZEnvC 056 Auckland Council v Auckland Council [pdf, 663 KB]

    ...Court; to appoint Mr Webb as amicus curiae; 3 c) to direct counsel for the s274 parties opposing the appeal to draft and file a pro forma application to strike out the appeal under s 279(4) of the Act; and d) to set a timetable for filing affidavits with a hearing on 9 April 2018. Background [4] Orewa Beach is exposed to easterly storms and may be subject to erosion, or at least littoral movement of sand, particularly in storm events. It is also subject to the effects of cli...