Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Eichelbaum [2015] NZLCDT 8 [pdf, 55 KB]
...including that Mr Eichelbaum had been warned to desist in his behaviour and had responded with threats. We regard this as being part of the conduct itself rather than an aggravating feature. She also pointed to his continuing to file inflammatory affidavits using intemperate language. Again we considered 6 there would be the risk of double counting were this to be regarded as an aggravating feature. [20] Finally, Ms Davenport points to the response the practitioner made...