[2018] NZEmpC 142 Noble v Ballooning Canterbury.com Ltd [pdf, 220 KB]
...reserving costs on applications for security for costs. [6] Mr Noble says that the only discernible reason for fixing costs now, other than the fact that costs normally follow the outcome, is that the Court had been swayed by the content of an affidavit that appeared to indicate that BCL is “somewhat impecunious”. [7] In support of his claim that the Employment Court’s usual practice was to reserve costs Mr Noble pointed to other decisions on applications for security for c...