[2020] NZEmpC 62 Gibson-Smith v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 388 KB]
...which he had no knowledge at the substantive hearing. It meant there was no longer a technological or practical impediment to him continuing to service tenancy, and not bond, calls as had always been the case. [74] Ms Thompson filed two affidavits. In the first, she emphasised that MBIE and its stakeholders’ aims had not changed. Due to the overlap and similarities between tenancy and bond queries, and the inefficiencies resulting from calls being transferred, it had...