Search Results

1. DZ v LU & IW Ltd [2024] NZDT 469 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

2. CN v B Ltd & ors [2024] NZDT 471 (31 May 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

3. BL v CD (NZ) Ltd [2024] NZDT 282 (9 May 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

4. KE v JM [2024] NZDT 332 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

5. EH v MG & FG [2024] NZDT 425 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

6. FD v HO & MO [2024] NZDT 558 (29 July 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determina...

7. BR & SR v LD & BD [2023] NZDT 740 (4 December 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

8. [2012] NZEmpC 63 Rooney Earthmoving Ltd v McTague Whiting and Bartlet [pdf, 304 KB]

   ROONEY EARTHMOVING LTD V KELVIN DOUGLAS MCTAGUE NZEmpC CHCH [2012] NZEmpC 63 [23 April 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2012] NZEmpC 63 CRC 21/07 IN THE MATTER OF a de novo challenge BETWEEN ROONEY EARTHMOVING LTD Plaintiff AND KELVIN DOUGLAS MCTAGUE First Defendant AND CLARENCE HENRY WHITING Second Defendant AND KERRY WAYNE BARTLETT Third Defendant Hearing: 21-24 and 29 June 2011 (Heard at Ashburton) And by submissions

9. Warin - Whangaruru Whakaturia 4 Lot 32 DP 126453 (Part) 30 Taitokerau MB 37 (30 TTK 37) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...Limited (1987) 12 NZTPA, EDS v Mangonui CC [1989] 3 NZLR 257 and Waikato Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc v Hamilton CC [2010] NZRMA 285. 8 16 Taitokerau MB 78. 30 Taitokerau MB 45 [31] The applicants also relied on documentary evidence including an affidavit that Mr Jensen swore in the High Court proceedings in 2004 and an affidavit that Elizabeth Makene, who was employed by the Māori Trustee, swore in 2002 in relation to the proceedings in this Court. Mr Jensen’s affidavit is unr...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 68 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...submitted that there is inconsistency between Mr Roest’s evidence before Judge Travis as to what transpired and what was discussed in the telephone conference call between LSG New Zealand and LSG Hong Kong, and Ms Park’s evidence and subsequent affidavits; this inconsistency may lead to injustice if the privilege is upheld. This injustice, he submitted, is that Mr Matsuoka would be prevented from testing the veracity of the evidence at trial (and the veracity of the conflicting...