Search Results

Search results for affidavit.

6642 items matching your search terms

  1. M Ltd v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 561 (24 July 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determina...

  2. TK v BD & TT Ltd [2024] NZDT 530 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

  3. MQ v CS [2024] NZDT 566 (29 July 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determina...

  4. Auckland Standards Committee v Ram [2011] NZLCDT 32 [pdf, 82 KB]

    ...practitioners regarding his status as a person entitled to practise on own account. (d) Charge 4 alleged that his responses to a judge on certain questions regarding security for costs were misleading. [2] In his formal response to the charges and affidavit in defence filed with the Tribunal, Mr Ram denied all of the charges. The charges were set down for a defended hearing over two days, 16 and 17 November 2011. [3] By a joint memorandum of 9 November 2011, the parties prop...

  5. EMPC Guidelines for applications and communications with the court [pdf, 108 KB]

    ...APPLICATIONS TO AND COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE COURT If a party or a party’s representative applies to the Court for an interlocutory order or other direction, an application in proper form, accompanied by a memorandum and/or supporting affidavit, should be made unless there are extraordinary circumstances (such as extreme urgency) which preclude compliance with this direction. In such cases the Court will accept a less formal communication (for example by email). If a party...

  6. Skerrett-White - Allotments 302 - 315 town of Richmond and Richmond Township Allotments 18 - 20 (2013) 2013 Chief Judge's MB 473 (2013 CJ 473) [pdf, 393 KB]

    ...flawed and the applicants were denied the opportunity to make meritorious objections to the application under s 215 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993. There was a failure to consult the relevant people and a lack of transparency in the process. The affidavits filed in support outline the surprise felt by the community upon discovering the land was to be sold. The change of status was also made without hearing evidence from the relevant people, who but for the 1998 order would have bee...

  8. Graham - Parish of Komakorau Lot 240B2 B (2015) 110 Waikato Maniapoto MB 161 (110 WMN 161) [pdf, 215 KB]

    ...October 2014. It appears at some stage that the trustees instructed the surveyors that they wished to reduce the size of the urupā from 2,662m 2 to 1,075m 2 . [13] I was concerned that the Court had not seen any survey plan until the third affidavit of Mania Hope was filed on 16 October 2015. The delay was explained as being a misunderstanding between the trustees and the surveyor. Ms Graham informed the Court that the trustees requested that the proposed urupā be boundary ma...

  9. [2015] NZEmpC 105 Scarborough v Micron Security Products Limited costs [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...parties. This alone would cause her application to fail. But the defendant has provided the Court with a substantial body of [uncontested] evidence indicating that Mr and Mrs Weston were not Ms Scarborough’s employers. … [23] Mr Weston’s affidavit also tends to confirm his contention that Ms Scarborough is seeking to join Mr and Mrs Weston for frivolous, vexatious and scurrilous reasons. These are principally in emails that Ms Scarborough has sent to the defendant’s...

  10. GI v UE LCRO 206 / 2010 (21 October 2011) [pdf, 128 KB]

    ...The documentary evidence establishing that obligation was referred to in the judgment of Stevens J. Acceptance of this liability was inherent in the fact that UD had lodged a complaint about ACI’s fees. [35] On 23 December 2008 UE swore an affidavit in which he stated that ACI confirmed to ACE and GI that it would not look to them for payment of legal fees. This is reinforced by the fact that neither GI nor ACE were included as defendants in the proceedings by ACI to recover i...