Search Results

1. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Persson [2014] NZLCDT 73 [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...pay the s 257 costs to be certified. 5. The practitioner will reimburse the s 257 costs to the New Zealand Law Society. 3 6. On the issue of suppression there will be an interim suppression order pending the practitioner filing affidavit evidence in support of his application for a final order within 21 days with leave for the Standards Committee to file any response within a further 7 days. The decision on final suppression is reserved on that basis. DATED at...

2. Huria - Town of Hokio Land Blocks (1998) 13 Whanganui Appellate MB 354 (13 WGAP 354) [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...on hold" until the appeal has been heard. They also ask that the business of the trust continue to be administered by a firm of real estate agents who currently have that responsibility. -~ .. , , The appiication was not acconiJlanied by an affidavit or statutory declaration in support as L required by R.81 Maori Land Court Rules 1994. It would a'ppear that the injunction is. ~--­ intended to mirror .. an application Jlreviously granted b)' HIS Honour Judge Marumaru . ag...

3. Trustees of Maungatautari 4G Sec IV v Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust - Maungatautari No 4G Sec IV (2014) 86 Waikato Maniapoto MB 248 (86 TTK 248) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...kilometre predator proof fence around Maungatautari mountain enclosing approximately 3,400 hectares. The land behind the fence is frequently referred to as the “Maungatautari Ecological Island”. 3 Affidavit of Malcolm Anderson, 19 March 2014 at [2]. 86 Waikato Maniapoto MB 251 [10] Prior to the completion of the predator proof fence MEIT was responsible for preliminary testing and field work on an appropriate fence type....

4. Gill v ACC [2015] NZACA 4 [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...1982 Act on 30 June 1992. [12] In terms of the statutory criteria for attendant care, there is a requirement for constant care or attention. To look at whether this threshold for care was needed during the relevant period, I will first review the affidavit sworn by Lisa’s mother, Mrs Linda Gill, on 25 October 2013, as to the care actually provided. I will then look at the medical evidence from the health practitioners who treated Lisa. This is followed by the expert reports obtained...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 8 X v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 40 KB]

   ...today, the date on which the Court has resumed hearings for the year. [3] The defendant does not oppose the granting of the orders sought. [4] I am satisfied, based on the grounds set out in the application filed on behalf of the plaintiff and the affidavit filed in support, that it is appropriate that an order 1 [2012] NZERA Christchurch 264 at [4]. for non-publication be made. In particular, that the interests of open justice are...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 56 Dream High Ltd v Ji [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...out that it was his responsibility to arrange service of the proceedings on the defendant as soon as possible. In one email dated 30 January 2015, Mr Lee said that he was sure that he had sent a copy of the proceedings to the defendant but no affidavit of service or statement of defence has ever been filed. At that stage, Mr Lee informed the Court that he had returned to Korea because of his father’s illness. 1 Ji v Dream High...

7. Notice of Response (Intention to Appear) to an application made under the Care of Children Act 2004 [docx, 22 KB]

   ..._GoBack]IN THE FAMILY COURT AT [Registry] FAM [insert number] [name of applicant] of [LOCATION], [OCCUPATION] Applicant [NAME OF RESPONDENT] of [LOCATION], [OCCUPATION] Respondent _________________________________________________________________ affidavit of Respondent in response to AN application MADE UNDER [Specify Act] Sworn/Affirmed [DATE] _________________________________________________________________ FILED BY: [LAWYER’S NAME, ADDRESS CONTACT DETAILS] I, [NAME O...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 120 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Maheno [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...being prompted by the Court Registry, it has taken no steps. [4] The amount sought by Ms Maheno is less than the amount that would be reached based on applying Category 2 Band B to each of the steps taken, namely filing a notice of opposition and affidavit, and preparing Ms Maheno’s submissions.2 [5] I am satisfied that the amount of $2,229 is appropriate in the circumstances. Conclusion [6] Carrington is ordered to pay Ms Maheno costs of $2,229 within seven days of the date o...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 171 E Tū Inc v Singh [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...memorandum filed on 29 September 2023, at [5]. Rules 2016, via reg 6 of the Employment Court Regulations.4 The nature of the slips in this case and the reasons underlying them, are set out in a joint memorandum of counsel and supporting affidavit. [3] I am satisfied that it is appropriate to correct the judgment as sought by counsel, and I have today reissued the corrected judgment to reflect the Court’s intentions. Christina Inglis Chief Judge J...

10. Auckland Standards Committee v AC [2011] NZLCDT 7 [pdf, 11 KB]

    ...Zealand Law Society. Pending hearing, which is scheduled to commence on 18 April next, the practitioner seeks interim suppression of his name. This is not opposed by the Law Society. [2] In support of his application the practitioner has filed an affidavit setting out his brief background as well as providing evidence to the Tribunal of the numerous associations he has in the community, with business and charitable organisations. Because of his involvement in these organisation...