[2012] NZEmpC 219 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ [pdf, 150 KB]
...Court and that it is not appropriate for Kensington Swan to be acting for both Mr Matsuoka and for Pacific. Pacific is not a party to the Employment Court proceedings. [8] In accordance with an agreed timetable, the parties exchanged memoranda, affidavits and summaries of submissions before the interlocutory hearing. LSG claims that a conflict of interest has arisen because Kensington Swan acted for Pacific in the High Court proceedings and now also acts for the plaintiff in the...