Search Results

1. X Ltd v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 335 (1 March 2023) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...$200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 28 days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determination...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 197 Otago Regional Council v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 982 KB]

   ...hazards sensitive activities. This involves: (a) updates to the planning maps identifying the new Gordon Road Floodway mapped area as a Hazard 1A (Flood) Overlay Zone; 3 Dated 22 December 2022. The s293 application was accompanied by supporting affidavits of Paul Freeland, Dr Jean-Luc Payan, Michelle Mifflin, Matthew Alley, Bikesh Shrestha, Tom Bassett and Gary Bayne. 4 Authored by Katie Sunley James and Andrew MacLennan, reviewed by Paul Freeland. 4 (b) policy amendments app...

3. CN & MN v KN & W Ltd [2024] NZDT 521 (7 August 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

4. NT & TL v X Ltd [2024] NZDT 194 (8 March 2024) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

5. Canterbury Standards Committee v Sisson [2011] NZLCDT 16 [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...her evidence Ms Sisson stated “... I gained the impression that Ms H had deliberately not disclosed the interest in the property as a way to avoid repayment of her costs. I did not probe the matter.” [7] Notwithstanding that view sworn in an affidavit dated 11 February 2010, and her strong approach along these lines to the Tribunal, Ms Sisson had on 1 March 2005 written a letter to the LSA, following a query by them, in which she stated “on review of the application for legal...

6. Rossi v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (Strike-Out Application) [2016] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...strike out applications. Although the applications overlap to a degree, each is best considered separately. Mr Rossi opposes the applications. For each he has filed three notices of opposition together with three documents intituled as supporting “affidavits”. However, the documents have not been sworn and are s imply signed statements. JURISDICTION TO STRIKE OUT [11] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to strike out proceedings has recently been addressed in Parohinog v Yellow Pages...

7. RA v LZ LCRO 2 / 2011 (22 August 2012) [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...Executors, the Practitioner instructed a barrister to issue proceedings by two of the Executors (Mr RD and one other brother) against Mr RA and one brother, for their removal as Executors. In relation to that proceeding the Practitioner filed an affidavit in support of the application. [7] The matter did not proceed to Court since the dispute was ultimately settled between the parties to the litigation. However, the court awarded neither party costs on the basis that the Judge cha...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 207 Sustainable Otakiri Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 825 KB]

   ...that to treat Sustainable Otakiri as the successor of all of them would wrongly expand the rights of appeal which only some of them had. [13] Sustainable Otakiri relies on the evidence of its chairperson, Ms Maureen Fraser, as contained in two affidavits sworn on 10 August 2018 and a third affidavit sworn on 27 September 2018. She has produced a number of relevant documents, including the ~~~$Cor."~~ .. ,\ submissions of members of the original group of people "Save our Ot...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 129 Maharaj v Wesley Wellington Mission Inc [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...Maharaj v Wesley Wellington Mission Inc [2016] NZERA Wellington 47. the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act), or alternatively, under s 4(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1950. Background [3] The background to this proceeding is set out in affidavits by Ms Andrea McKenzie and Mr Maharaj and is not in dispute. From August 2003, Mr Maharaj was engaged by Wesley as a Relief Caregiver. In August 2005 he was contracted to provide full-time care on a referral basis. In that c...

10. [2021] NZEmpC 198 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 388 KB]

    ...However, the time actually spent in responding to the plaintiffs’ notice requiring disclosure was much higher, given the multiple range of categories it referred to. [8] Second, the scale does not account for costs incurred in the preparation of affidavit evidence for interlocutory hearings. Here, extensive evidence had to be prepared by IR for three hearings on disclosure matters, and in applying for Madison to be joined as a party to the proceedings. [9] Third, the scale li...