Search Results

1. Application for exercise of court’s jurisdiction in respect of enduring power of attorney - PPPR 24 [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...……………………………………………………………………………………….. [occupation] Person the application is about [Set out full description of document (including whether it is made with or without notice), its date, and, in the case of an affidavit or affirmation, the name of the deponent and in whose support it is filed.] This document is filed by [name and address for service, and if filed by lawyers, the name and telephone number of the...

2. Singh v Registrar of Immigration Advisers [2015] NZIACDT 65 (27 May 2015) [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...important evidence, and his complaint is not trivial. He says the adviser manipulated him, lied to him, and exploited him. He says he was vulnerable, and that aggravates the situation. The decision appealed against [8] The Registrar provided an affidavit and submissions setting out the process she used to evaluate the complaint, which is subject to this appeal, and the information she considered. [9] The Registrar received Mr Singh’s complaint. The allegations were: [9.1] Negligenc...

3. TK v GC LCRO 245/2015 (5 April 2016) [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...visited his home and collected the mail. • Although by Mr TK’s calculation the application is one day late the LCRO should take the above submissions into account and accept the application. [7] Ms IW, Mr TK’s partner has provided an affidavit supporting that Mr TK did not receive the decision until 2 October 2015. [8] Under the original wording of s 198, the 30 working day period began on the day the Standards Committee determination was made. The effect of this was that...

4. ZC v DM LCRO 307/2013 (30 January 2014) [pdf, 25 KB]

   ...within the statutory time limit. [6] There is no dispute that the Standards Committee decision was made available to the Applicant via email on 23 July 2013 (that is, on the same day the decision was made). The Applicant confirmed this in his affidavit to this Office. The first question is whether the email from the Law Society dated 23 July 2013 meets the service or notice requirements set out by s 198 of the Act as amended. In this day and age I have no doubt that communication...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 155 Domingo v Suon and Heng t/aTown and Country Food [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...statement of defence to the plaintiff’s claim within the applicable timeframe and until yesterday took no steps in relation to it. The claim was set down for hearing today by way of notice of hearing dated 29 September 2016. It appears from an affidavit filed on behalf of the plaintiff that the notice of hearing was subsequently served. [5] Yesterday afternoon (22 November 2016) a statement of defence was presented for filing along with a memorandum of counsel. I issued dir...

6. Minute of the Environment Court (dated 23 March 2017) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...Society has in its memorandum. [4] Before I turn to the Society's memorandum all parties are to keep in mind that to advance any matter in this appeal they should formally apply for orders from the court (and, if required, include supporting affidavits) or, as the case requires, give reasons for further directions in a comprehensive supporting memorandum. In short, it should not be left to the court to work out what is being asked of it. Blueskin Energy v DCC Minute 23 March 20...

7. Rewa v Aukaha - Motiti North- D5, D6A, E1, E2, E3, E4, and E9 Blocks (2007) 89 Tauranga MB 292 (89 T 292) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...there is nothing in this case that warrants an exception. In this case Mr Rewa was ultimately unsuccessful and must bear the responsibility. [12] Although parties were unrepresented in Court, they did seek legal advice for the preparation of affidavits. These costs were incurred by both parties. [13] I am particularly persuaded towards an award of costs based on the fact that Mr Rewa pursued the injunction application only to later appear in Court with no evidence nor, as he state...

8. [2018] NZENvC 184 Timbergrow Limited v Gisborne District Council [pdf, 508 KB]

   ...slash, log end and other debris removal). [4] The appeals each allege lack of clarity in the relevant conditions and seek amendment to the specified timeframes for compliance. [5] Each stay application, pursuant to s325(3A) RMA, is accompanied by affidavits by Mr Mcinnes, Regional Manager for Ernslaw One Ltd and manager responsible for Timergrow's operations. These attest to Mr Mcinnes' position as to the lack of clarity in relevant conditions, unsuccessful endeavours to r...

9. [2020] NZEmpC 83 Hurst v Hodgson [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...that Mr Hurst would be a key witness in the determination of Mr Reimann’s challenge and, if not a party, he will need to be summonsed. Mr Reimann also abides the decision of the Court.6 [9] In the circumstances, and having considered the affidavits filed by Mr Hurst, and the submissions filed on his behalf, I consider it is in the interests of justice that an extension of time is granted to him to bring a challenge to the determination. Accordingly, leave is granted to extend...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 138 Eska Co Ltd [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...The principal matters raised with respect to this application can be summarised as: (a) The challenge raises substantive issues and in fairness ought to be heard as soon as possible. (b) Ms Beloous has provided misleading information in her affidavit – she attests to being “a new New Zealander” but has resided in New Zealand for some time and holds a New Zealand passport. (c) Ms Beloous has now instituted proceedings in the High Court to wind up ESKA. (d) ESKA has...