Search Results

1. LS v CC [2024] NZDT 773 (18 December 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

2. TI v UB [2025] NZDT 47 (31 March 2025) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

3. LM v S Ltd [2025] NZDT 86 (28 May 2025) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

4. OT v C Ltd [2025] NZDT 99 (9 May 2025) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

5. [2010] NZEmpC 87 Melville v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...so and to conclude that it would be unjustifiable to dismiss Lynette from the employment. [6] The plaintiff and Mr Townsend attended a final meeting on 24 March 2009 at which the plaintiff was dismissed for serious misconduct. Mr Townsend’s affidavit evidence was that his immediate response to the defendant’s managers was to say: “See you in Court”. As the plaintiff and Mr Townsend were leaving, the plaintiff’s immediate manager, Nic Csongor, called out, “Thank you,...

6. Owhetu Block Charitable Trust - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 427145 (2015) 98 Taitokerau MB 242 (98 TKT 242) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...$150,000.00 was paid by the Pukahakaha Trust to the Owhetu Charitable Trust. The Owhetu Charitable Trust used that deposit to meet its liabilities with IRD. 8 95 Whangarei MB 196 (95 WH 196). 9 Affidavit of Perei Mahanga dated 12 May 2014 at [44]. 98 Taitokerau MB 247 [20] The Owhetu Charitable Trust now seek an order vesting the land in the Pukahakaha Trust and declaring the land to be Māori freehold land pursuant t...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 76 George v Auckland City Council and vice versa [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...George’s two expert witnesses reiterate, in very summary and hearsay form, what is outlined in her evidence summarised above. [8] Although the foregoing summarises what is in Ms George’s brief of evidence-in-chief, she has now added to that by an affidavit sworn in opposition to this application, and so I will assume that the additional affidavit evidence about the events of the mediation will emerge at trial if it is allowed. [9] Ms George says that until 26 April 2010 (the d...

8. Willson v CAC301 & Ors [2015] NZREADT 90 [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...himself. 7 [39] To Mr J Gaukrodger the licensee responded that the vendor did not mention the mine proposal to him at material times and never has and he and his office simply did not know of the proposal at material times. [40] An affidavit was filed by Mr I J Croft, a licensed salesperson colleague of Mr Willson, confirming that he also had no prior knowledge of the mine proposal until he read media articles about it in early October 2012. [41] An affidavit has also...

9. Eichelbaum v CAC303 & Anor (ruling) [2016] NZREADT 3 [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...the papers, then the appellant has never had a face to face or viva voce hearing at all. 71. That is no answer. Under Part 4 and ss 75 – 99 the CAC has very broad powers, akin to those of a Court or Tribunal, to call for evidence, to receive affidavits, to require production of documents and to hold a hearing on the papers “unless the Committee otherwise directs” (s 90(3) REAA). Section 90(2) is consistent with this. 72. That proviso is ample authority for a complainant to re...

10. Nicholls v Nicholls - W T Nicholls Trust [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 636 (2013 APPEAL 636) [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...December 2013. Mr Kahukiwa advised the Court on 23 December 2013 that the respondents had raised nothing new that warranted the excuse of the right of reply granted to his client. We note that enclosed with the submissions filed by Mr Wackrow was an affidavit of Mark Stevens dated 13 November 2013. We have not considered it necessary to refer to that affidavit. 1 27 Waikato Maniapoto MB 107-169 (27 WMN 107-169). 2 49 Waikato Maniapo...