[2013] NZEmpC 11 Christiansen v Sevans Group (NZ) Ltd & Others [pdf, 109 KB]
...Mercer is the sole director of the first respondent company. He is also the second respondent. He appeared at Court this morning and was permitted to give evidence, and advance submissions opposing the application. I was also assisted by the affidavit evidence filed by the applicant, and her submissions. [5] There is no dispute that the first respondent has taken no steps to comply with the Authority’s compliance order. Mr Mercer’s evidence was that the company has been stru...