LCRO 126/2023 EG v HJ (28 November 2023) [pdf, 283 KB]
...creditor on the lodgement of both caveats. [6] There is neither primary nor secondary evidence as to the nature of the caveatable interest claimed by the creditor under either caveat. The caveat instruments are not in the materials and the affidavit evidence subsequently given relates only to a third caveat later lodged against the title to the [Suburb B] property. [7] The lawyer acting for the applicant was Mr KD of law firm, [Law Firm B] (the applicant’s lawyer). On 4 Apri...