Search Results

1. UN v B Ltd & DN [2025] NZDT 70 (20 March 2025) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

2. KL v SN & NM [2024] NZDT 893 (16 December 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

3. FC & NH v LT [2024] NZDT 856 (29 August 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determina...

4. Appellate judgments 2025

   ...related CA matter).SC in first recall, found no grounds for recusal, and regardless leave dismissed (no realistic prospects of success).Now H arguing remaining two judges should not have decided on alleged conflict without considering application to file affidavit.Held: No valid grounds for latest recallAppropriate for two panel judges to decide on recall (no conflicts) Affidavit evidence unnecessary as basis for recusal and case management functions clear from record. Registrar instructed not...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Appellate court judgments

5. Hunia v Skerrett-White - Kawerau A8D (2016) 146 Waiariki MB 281 (146 WAR 281) [pdf, 620 KB]

   ...on the land. 12 The variations also included extending the powers of the trustees to empower them to employ persons, pay their own costs and investigate the possibility of entering into geothermal development projects. [10] According to the affidavit of Ms Skerrett-White, since 2005 the day to day administration of the trust had been undertaken by Taumanu Associates (“Taumanu”), a consultancy business where the partners were Stan Knuth and herself. 13 Later in 2005 the tru...

6. Hettig v ANZ Bank of New Zealand Ltd - Lot 1 Deposited Plan 158328, CT NA95A/121 (2014) 93 Taitokerau MB 238 (93 TTK 238) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...descent. Mr Hettig further argued that Takangaroa Moanaroa is also a beneficiary of the Trust, she is a member of Ngāti Wai, and as such the land holds special significance for her as well. [61] Mr Crossland submits that there is no evidence in the affidavits filed concerning the hapū that affiliates with this property. He argued that if ANZ are found to have done something wrong in this matter Mr Hettig or others can take proceedings against them, they can seek damages and ANZ...

7. Epere - Waima A12B and 2 others and Taheke 25 and 1 other (2012) 35 Taitokerau 131 (35 TKT 131) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...section 164(5) of the Act. (5) Where a vesting order is sought to effect a gift of any land or interest in land having a value in excess of $2,000, evidence in support of the application from the alienor, if not given in person, shall be by way of affidavit or declaration or evidence taken by a Registrar acting pursuant to rule 51 of these rules. [29] I considered the nature of the Court’s discretion under s 164 in Barnes – Te Horo 2B2B2B Residue 1 . That judgment concerned...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 137 Pollard Contracting Ltd v Donald [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...Plaintiff's view that even if it was raised in time, the statement of problem failed to sufficiently specify the particulars of the alleged personal grievance so that the Plaintiff could address it. 28. On 6 November 2013, the Plaintiff filed an affidavit of Ms Paterson in the Authority. This affidavit pertained to the matters set out in paragraphs 24 -26 of this agreed statement of facts. 29. On 14 November 2013 Ms Sue Freeman from Courier Post emailed Ms Lin at the Autho...

9. Ryan v CAC 20002 & Skinner [2013] NZREADT 45 [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...appropriate contract to purchase. [19] The appellant’s various submissions on appeal to us effectively traverse the same ground as she covered before the Committee and which we deal with below. Licensee’s Response [20] In a 5 October 2012 affidavit, the licensee relevantly: [a] outlines the timing and nature of his correspondence with the appellant, the Andersons, Mr Kaur, and other potential customers. [b] argues that it was not because of any delay on his part that the poss...

10. Auckland Standards committee 2 v Burcher Short [2015] NZLCDT 47 [pdf, 78 KB]

    ...Burcher and Mr Short, particularly as to the level of involvement of Mr Short in the affairs of the nominee company and his knowledge of investments relating to his client investors. [12] Somewhat unfortunately, a very lengthy and comprehensive affidavit sworn by Mr Short approximately one month before the hearing was not served on Mr Burcher nor his counsel (both of them were out of New Zealand at the time). [13] Despite a number of promises, at pre-trial conference stage, to fil...