Search Results

Search results for affidavit.

6581 items matching your search terms

  1. Mok v Boyd [2010] NZWHT Auckland 29 [pdf, 264 KB]

    ...concrete foundations and floors”.8 ix. Mr Boyd cannot point to any other person who was the project manager or site supervisor. He accepted in his closing submissions that: 8 Affidavit of Blake Boyd sworn 14 May 2010 at [12] Page | 19 “As there was no project manager and no need to have a project manager at the time, these tasks [of arranging subcontractors] fell on me as there was no one else that coul...

  2. Chen v Gu-Chang [2013] NZIACDT 16 (19 March 2013) [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang’s response [110] Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang responded to the respective complaints against them jointly, through their counsel Mr Laurent. [111] Mr Laurent produced: [111.1] A memorandum (with attachments). [111.2] An affidavit of Mr D J Ryken, a lawyer experienced in immigration matters. [111.3] An affidavit of Mr D N Cooper, a licensed immigration adviser. [111.4] A letter from Mr Matsumoto, a licensed immigration adviser. [111.5] A chart comparing inform...

  3. Adlam v Reihana - Himatangi 1H1A (2022) 447 Aotea MB 1 (447 AOT 1) [pdf, 658 KB]

    ...activity under the District Plan requiring a specific resource consent.8 6 445 Aotea MB 54-56 (445 AOT 54-56); and 445 Aotea MB 57-59 (445 AOT 57-59). 7 There is no occupation order or similar in place with respect to this dwelling. 8 See Affidavit of Vincent Ashman, Horowhenua District Council dated 9 December 2021. 447 Aotea MB 5 [10] There is currently legal access to the block from SH1, but no formed access to the proposed house site.9 [11] The block is currentl...

  4. 2023-NZEnvC-244-The-Canyon-Vineyard-Limited-v-Central-Otago-District-Council.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

    ...part and all parties otherwise agreed that the second mound should be reinstated.8 [10] The second mound had previously only been identified in the evidence of Paul Andrew Smith,9 and was not drawn to scale. Because of this, the parties’ filed an affidavit of Keith Wallace Sanford10 outlining the evidential basis for the location of the mound. Mr Sandford states that while particular attention was being paid to the preparation of sight line information in the preparation of plans fol...

  5. LCRO 36/2024 CFJ v BDU (31 July 2025) [pdf, 254 KB]

    ...mobile number. Unbeknownst to the applicant, the respondent’s partner’s mobile phone was not working. No attempt was made to contact the respondent, either directly or through her relationship property lawyer. [9] The applicant’s evidence by affidavit was that he had no contact details for the respondent except her residential address; that is, he had no mobile number, landline number or email address. The applicant stated that he had never communicated directly with the respond...

  6. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1) [pdf, 720 KB]

    ...whenua representatives with experience in a cultural context were present during the works to ensure that proper protocols would be followed in the event of an accidental find. 23 Affidavit of Associate Professor Jonathan Noel Procter sworn 4 March 2019, at [31] 415 Aotea MB 12 [32] Regarding consultation, Mr Sword argued that, although they do not require permission, they have consulted with the trust beneficiaries...

  7. [2015] NZEmpC 190 Brown v Adams t/a Untouchable Hair & Skin [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...Hair & Skin v Brown, above n 1, at [144] . person studied at Waimea College (as did Ms Brown) and lives in Nelson (as did Ms Brown). In her cross-examination Ms Brown acknowledged the document was part of her profile page. In her affidavit filed for the purposes of the application for a rehearing, Ms Brown says that she wished to produce a copy of her then current Facebook page to the hearing. She attached a copy of that exhibit to her affidavit. It appears to be a s...

  8. Yan v CAC306 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 47 [pdf, 220 KB]

    ...[35] Ms Wang seemed vague about the price the complainant hoped to buy the property for, but thought it would be over $490,000 but did not seem to recall the actual price paid by the complainant. She also responded to Ms Earl that after she made an affidavit to support the complainant in these proceedings, she received a telephone call from the licensee and they had a brief conversation in which he suggested to her that some of the things she had stated were incorrect. The Evidence of...

  9. Carley (INZ) v B [2015] NZIACDT 96 (17 November 2015) [pdf, 179 KB]

    ...Zealand regarding the issue and sought their guidance, she used independent verification, and took robust steps to manage the issues in her practice. Immigration New Zealand did not challenge her evidence regarding those steps. [29] Ms B provided an affidavit from one of the two employees who allegedly attempted to bribe IOM. One of the employees denied having attempted to bribe IOM, and said that in fact the IOM official had attempted to solicit a sexual relationship with her. Evaluat...

  10. Nicholls v Nicholls – W T Nicholls Trust (2013) 55 Waikato Maniapoto MB 288 (55 WMN 288) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...pause making any decision until the appeal is completed. [55] The Applicant makes the point that the same rationale I applied to the outstanding part of the application could also be applied in this situation. Evidence of the Applicant [56] The affidavit made by Mr George Tama Nicholls is in part related to the appeal of the decision I made in December but also raises issues with regard to Judge Milroy’s decision in establishing the WT Nicholls Ahu Whenua Trust. [57] Mr Georg...