LCRO 382/2013 SC v JT (30 June 2017) [pdf, 193 KB]
...standards … [59] I have given careful consideration to the decision in UFv OU. The facts in that case are readily distinguishable from the circumstances of the present case. [60] In UF, the practitioner was making demand for comments made in an affidavit filed with the Court to be withdrawn. Whilst the practitioner was concerned that allegations had been made in the affidavit which impugned his reputation, attempts to have evidence which had been put before the Court withdrawn b...