LCRO 277/2016 CH v DS (7 March 2019) [pdf, 175 KB]
...relationship property matters. [18] HM responded on 1 April 2016. The first item in his letter referred to the Protection Order. He said: CH is adamant that he does not need to attend a non-violence program…[and] refutes what VN has alleged in her affidavit…. [19] HM advised that he would: shortly be filing [a] detailed response and seeking a formal hearing in the Family Court so that CH can be heard on the issue of the existing temporary Protection Order. [20] It is clear...