Search Results

1. BX v W Ltd [2023] NZDT 709 (21 December 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinatio...

2. QB v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 243 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

3. DB & NB v R Ltd & D Ltd [2024] NZDT 439 (14 May 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

4. TX & UX v XC Ltd [2024] NZDT 440 (1 May 2024) [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

5. [2025] NZSSAA 22 (2 July 2025) [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...of the legal costs sought and tasks undertaken. Mr Toilolo duly responded. 9. This exchange resulted in a reduction of 1 hour and 30 minutes (1:30 hrs) by Mr Toilolo “for preparation and drafting time” for High Court work, in relation to affidavits, preparation work during the early stages of the matter. Mr Toilolo advised that during the early stage of the matter he had explored various options to take XXXX’s situation forward. Legal framework 10. Regulation 255 of...

6. Nga Hau e Wha National Marae Charitable Trust – Nga Hau e Wha Marae (2013) 20 Te Waipounamu MB 152 (20 TWP 152) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...that there is no need to amend the purpose of the reservation before commencing work on the proposed housing project. There are also plans to “regularise [the] Marae in regard to the Youth Court for Christchurch”.9 At [14] of Mr Dewes’ affidavit dated 19 July 2013, he states: Given recent advice from Mr Tamihere we do not believe we need to amend the 1990 Gazette Notice as to purposes. In his opinion, it allows for our Trusteeship to evolve and adopt policy to meet the new...

7. Marumaru v Waipakuranui Incorporation (2012) 279 Aotea MB 137 (279 AOT 137) [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...having left during the lease discussion). The report on the farm prepared by John Stantiall, which canvassed the options of selling the Howard‟s block and leasing the farm. 279 A otea MB 145 Reply from Mr Marumaru [34] In a reply affidavit dated 29 July 2010, Mr Marumaru maintained his interpretation of events. He also claimed that the kaupapa of the Incorporation, to maintain the farm and farm it themselves, has been forgotten. In addition, he alleged that the shareho...

8. Otago Standards Committee v Saunderson-Warner [2013] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...regarded this as a problem. She told the office manager that she “was concerned that a debtor who was being pursued by our clients appeared to be a client of the firm, and that this was an actual or potential conflict of interest”. In her affidavit she went on to say that, while she did not feel able to interrupt the client meeting, as soon as she could she spoke with Ms Saunderson-Warner about the “problem that (she) had identified”. There was a discussion about the H’...

9. [2015] NZEmpC 104 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd [pdf, 235 KB]

   KANA SHANMUGANATHAN v POWERNET LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 104 [2 July 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 104 EMPC 285/2014 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KANA SHANMUGANATHAN Plaintiff AND POWERNET LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 25 - 26 May 2015 (heard at Invercargill) Appearances: M J Thomas, counsel for the Plaintiff

10. [2015] NZEmpC 76 Sealord Group Ltd v Pickering [pdf, 192 KB]

    ...with the date decided upon. In this case, however, I found that exercise to be virtually impossible without resorting to the Authority's determination. I also obtained assistance from other documentation before the Authority, including an affidavit Mr Pickering had produced "in respect of his earnings". That particular affidavit was included in the bundle of documents produced in this Court but its contents were significant and what he had to say should have...