Search Results

1. BS v KC & DC [2024] NZDT 489 (11 June 2024) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 244 Bowkett v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...Bielby factors are substantively applicable for the following reasons: (a) arguments advanced without substance – the primary issue at the hearing related to the potential for the Court to exercise its discretion. Mr Bowkett outlined in his affidavit dated 27 February 2024, that the stone boxes were temporary, and signalled that he was willing to remove the boxes within 12 months, to find an alternative long-term solution, and file any necessary resource consents; (b) argument...

3. 2025 NZPSPLA 057.pdf [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...continue in his roles after receiving such convictions would lower the credibility and accountability of the industry Mr Morrison submits. Mr Shepherd’s position [20] Mr Shepherd gave extensive and detailed oral evidence, he also filed an affidavit and 23 references, 16 of which were from women. The references were from clients of HCS, other members of the security industry, parents of volunteers and volunteers at the Trust, neighbours, and employees of the Trust and HCS. [2...

4. Epiha v Peihopa - Kaikou H (2025) 293 Taitokerau MB 225 (293 TTK 225) [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...[16] The application for an injunction against Glen and Sheena has proceeded alongside the application seeking the removal of Glen. Final accounting information, and other relevant information that had been requested, as well as responses to the affidavits filed, were filed in a piecemeal manner, which meant that a final hearing could not be held until June 2025. [17] This decision addresses the injunction and removal application following the hearing on the 27th of June 2025. 5...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 138 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...Mr Hamilton wished Mr Carran "good luck" and indicated that Michael Talley would never "give up" in his opposition to the Union's access to the plant and attempts to negotiate a collective agreement for the plant. [17] Affidavit evidence before the Authority from Mr Hamilton denies any such observations of the sort alluded to in the preceding paragraph, were made, and denies having a conversation with Mr Carran about Michael Talley. [18] Mr Tony Matterso...

6. Haimona v The Trustees of Te Karaka No.1A Ahu Whenua Trust - Te Karaka No.1A [2015] Chief Judge's MB 228 (2015 CJ 228) [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...f) It is fair and reasonable in the circumstances that the injunction be granted so the Trustees can continue with the development of the land for the benefit of the beneficiaries of the Trust. 37. Filed in support of the Injunction is an affidavit by Davey Gardiner, a trustee. It provides a background to the lands and the recent history to do with the Te Karaka No. 1A Ahu Whenua Trust and the Haimona whanau occupation. 38. This application has been adjourned various times p...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 148 Lewis v JPMprgan Chase Bank NA [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...disclosure (discovery) of certain documents. [24] The sixth matter dealt with is the plaintiff’s application for a verification order under reg 46 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 (the Regulations) requiring the defendant to make an affidavit stating whether the specified documents or categories of documents are, or have at any time, been in its possession, custody or control and, if such document or documents is or are no longer in the defendant’s possession, c...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 60 Walker v Firth Industries [pdf, 185 KB]

   WALKER v FIRTH INDUSTRIES a division of FLETCHER CONCRETE & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMTED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 60 [30 April 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2014] NZEmpC 60 CRC 22/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PETER JAMES WALKER Plaintiff AND FIRTH INDUSTRIES a division of FLETCHER CONCRETE & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMTED Defendant Hearing: 16

9. Morgan v CAC 20003 [2014] NZREADT 14 [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...agent work. Given the complexities of the transactions and long history, it is submitted that there was an onus upon the CAC to source all relevant contractual documentation, which it did not do. Mr Morgan has now sourced and attached to his affidavit documents which support dismissal of the charges. He has provided a copy of a sale and purchase agreement in the Shallue-Denize transaction from the Shallue’s solicitors, which shows the PGGW logo crossed out. He has provided the c...

10. Tomov v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 34 [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...the other parties claiming 25 against PBS to make out their claim. In the circumstances this is essentially a matter of formal proof. Analysis of the Claim against PBS [88] Ms Wei Wei Zhang gave evidence (confirming her earlier affidavit filed in support of the joinder of PBS) that PBS, trading as VentClad, was engaged by Modern Homes Development Limited to supply and oversee the installation of the Eterpan cladding. Mr Walsh, the labour only builder and seventh r...