Search Results

1. EU & SU v KC [2024] NZDT 615 (15 July 2024) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

2. EZ & UC v HQ & LQ [2024] NZDT 424 (15 May 2024) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

3. BE v W Ltd & KN [2024] NZDT 885 (15 December 2024) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

4. TC & QC v FT & TT [2025] NZDT 71 (6 March 2025) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

5. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Horsley [2018] NZLCDT 22 [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...that agreement so that the work is “merely transactional” and the matter is “non-contentious” and a conflict less likely to exist. [34] We also, with respect, reject the evidence provided by Mr Haynes who was called as an expert but whose affidavit was simply read without cross-examination that a competent lawyer could have concluded there was no conflict of interest and therefore it was unnecessary to advise to seek independent legal advice. [35] The Rules do permit the pra...

6. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 v H [2013] NZLCDT 7 [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...The Standards Committee position is that it would abide the order of the Tribunal but pointed out that it was the practitioner’s onus to displace the presumption of openness of disciplinary proceedings. [22] The application is supported by affidavits from the practitioner, a partner in the firm, [redacted], and his general practitioner. The medical evidence confirms Mr H’s own evidence [redacted]. 11 [23] Section 240 provides that the identity of the practitioner or...

7. Mane - Waihou A8C1B1 (2015) 117 Taitokerau MB 215 (117 TTK 215) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...up, I never brought it. But where she said that she’s not – she didn’t want a papakainga anymore. She told me here. She told me this regardless of what was written in the Will. She tried the Courts – in fact – where was it? In the affidavits of Judge Spencer, in the Court minutes in August 2006, there come a time where the Court was going to gift the house back. It’s recorded in there, “I’m going to make a decision,” this is what Spencer said, “I’m going to...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 165 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...represented at the hearing of the applications affecting them. The applications were set down for argument. PFC and PRI were given the opportunity, if they wished, to present their positions on the non- party disclosure applications by way of filing affidavits. Mr J K Goodall, counsel for the non-parties, filed a memorandum prior to the hearing on 9 July 2013 indicating that the non-parties would not be filing any affidavits nor appearing at the hearing and would abide the decisio...

9. Gardiner v Gorringe (2011) 25 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (25 WMN 83) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...June 2010. In addition to hearing evidence from the parties, the Court also received a significant amount of expert evidence from: a farm consultant; two soil scientists; and a veterinarian. Following the hearing further evidence in the form of affidavits and answers to interrogatories was supplied to the Court by the soil scientists. The final evidence was received on or about 11 August 2010. [26] Closing submissions were then filed by the parties. The final set of submission...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 92 H v A Limited [pdf, 263 KB]

    ...order should have been made by the Authority and I disagree with the reasoning and the decision of the majority of this Court to make such an order. The following are my reasons for diverging from the majority view. [31] The plaintiff has filed affidavits in support of the challenge. The defendant opposes the application, arguing that the threshold for non-publication has not been met in the circumstances of this case. The plaintiff contends that he is not obliged to point to e...