6538 items matching your search terms
DAVID RODKISS v CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 147 [27 August 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 147 CRC 52/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DAVID RODKISS Plaintiff AND CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers by submissions filed 21 April, 7 and 18 May 2015) Counsel: N Ironside, c
ITE v ALA NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 42 [15 April 2016] THERE IS AN ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE NAMES OF THE PARTIES AND ANY INFORMATION LEADING TO THE PARTIES' IDENTITY. IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 42 EMPC 196/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ITE Plaintiff AND ALA Defendant EMPC 272/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge
...9 59 Ōtaki MB 57 (59 OTI 57) 10 89 Ōtaki MB 269 (89 OTI 269) 11 200 Aotea MB 38 (200 AOT 38) 314 Aotea MB 166 [20] Kathryn Knowles, an accounts clerk with Fluker Denton, accountants of Levin provided affidavit evidence on the Incorporation’s records. She stated that the shareholders’ cards were originally small yellow cards which were subsequently changed to larger white cards which she says were easier to handle. Ms Knowles then state
...the Insolvency Act 1967. 17 Chapman v Weathertight Homes Tribunal [2012] NZHC 1377. 18 Invercargill City Council v Hamlin [1996] 1 NZLR 513(PC). 25 [67] In their affidavits, Mr and Mrs Kim, said that they discovered some cracks in their home in 2007. At that time they engaged a builder to repair the cracks. This is consistent with what they told the assessor when he visited the property in 2011 for...
...discretion, Mr Watson submits: (a) The rationale for the transfer includes reference to a covenant said to exist between the late Graham Matthews and his mother. Mr Watson said that there is no documentary evidence of such a covenant. There is only an affidavit from Graham Matthews dated 20 February 2009 which at most 2015 Maori Appellate Court MB 523 establishes that the land was not to be fragmented and was to be held by him for life. It also refers to keeping the land to...
...was not sufficient evidence to establish that the trust created or encouraged a belief that the substituted lease would allow the lessees to remain permanently in the properties. 19 Affidavit of W Tane sworn 9 May 2014 Exhibit “AA”. 2015 Māori Appellate Court 625 [41] However, we have some concern that Judge Armstrong failed to consider whether the trustees had a duty to bring to the attention of the appella...
WARREN BANKS v HOCKEY MANAWATU INCORPORATED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 97 [5 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 97 EMPC 206/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN WARREN BANKS Plaintiff AND HOCKEY MANAWATU INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: (by a submissions-only telephone hearing on
...presented on the tikanga of Ngāti Mahuta by the late Fred Kana and Dr Ngapare Hopa. Judge Carter summarised Mr Kana’s evidence as follows: 19 Mr Kana is a [descendant] of Ngati Mahuta and affiliated to the Maketu Marae in Kawhia. In his Affidavit he confirmed his understanding that whangai in a general sense is the adoption of a child in accordance with tikanga Maori, that is where a child who is not a child of a person is raised by that person as though their own although...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 033 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s 325 of the Act BETWEEN DONGHUA LlU (ENV-2017 -AKL-000126) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone pursuant to s279(1 )(e) of the Act Hearing: at Auckland on 3 December 2018 Appearances: F Pilditch for Appellant N Batts for Responden
...with Ms Z’s lawyer to resolve the child support/notices of claim disputes. A sticking point was the timing of paying the child support on the one hand and discharging the notices of claim on the other hand. (g) Mr AP was insistent that an affidavit be prepared for the High Court outlining his concerns about Mr W. Mr RE advised strongly against this and said that it was inappropriate. To ensure no misunderstanding 7 Mr RE used a Mandarin speaking lawyer from his law fir...