Search Results

1. Love v Samuel and Sharon Gemmell Whanau Trust - Anatohia Section 90C Block XVIII Gore SD [2016] Chief Judge's MB 122 (2016 CJ 122) [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...addressed to Mrs S Gemmell from the Department of Conservation; c) A letter dated 16 February 2012 addressed to Sam and Sharon Gemmell from the Marlborough District Council; d) A file note for a Site inspection undertaken on 7 October 2011; e) An affidavit filed by Sam Gemmell dated 26 November 2014 is summarised as follows: i. The Block is owned by the Sam and Sharon Gemmell Family Trust (“the Trust”) constituted on 10 July 2002; ii. The Trustees are Sam Carter Gemmell an...

2. BORA Criminal Record (Expungement of Convictions for Historical Homosexual Offences) Bill [pdf, 8.6 MB]

   ...specified aspects of, the decision: 8 Criminal Records (Expungement of Convictions for Historical Homosexual Offences) Bill Part 2 cl 18 (b) information or further information (including written evidence given on oath or affirmation and by affidavit) that is or may be relevant to, or to specified aspects of, the decision. (3 ) A person (other than one specified in subsection (4)) commits an offence if the person, without reasonable excuse,— (a) fails to produce, or to allow...

3. LCRO 240/2013 TM v DC (8 May 2017) [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...65 Crimes Act 1961, s 108(1). 21 … an assertion as to a matter of fact, opinion, belief, or knowledge made by a witness in a judicial proceeding as part of his or her evidence on oath, whether the evidence is given in open Court or by affidavit or otherwise, that assertion being known to the witness to be false and being intended by him or her to mislead the tribunal holding the proceeding. [85] It may well have been the case that Ms [J], when put on oath and alerted to the...

4. Macolm - Okataina 10 (2001) 206 Rotorua MB 287 (260 ROT 287) [pdf, 5.8 MB]

   ...the obligations of the lessee under a contract for the grant of the lease. 5. Mr Malcom and others by his leave have neglected or refused to quit and deliver up possession of the land to the trustees. 6. Upon the further grounds appearing in the affidavits of Murray Lloyd Patchell, Rubyanne Taawai Ahomiro and Peter James Livingston filed in support of the application. Further orders were sought for payment by Mr Malcom of mesne profits to the Trust for occupation of the land and for...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 030 Zindia Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   ...Harvest Plan'. [28] For completeness, the companion application for the land use consent for activities in relation to the foreshore reserve (this consent numbered U120345.6) 12 13 Copies of these and related documents are attached to the affidavit of Reuben John Fergusson, for the Council, dated 12 November 2018 and his reference numbering is applied here. RJF2. 9 described the activity for which that consent was sought in terms similarly related to commercial forest...

6. LCRO 213/2015 HY Trust v AK and GJ (21 Janaury 2019) [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...Replies Mr GJ [26] In reply to the complaint, Mr GJ says he and Mr AK “lived with this matter for some time, and … did not form the view precipitately to plead fraud”. Mr GJ says he received instructions from [Company A] after pleadings and affidavits had been filed and the summary judgment hearing had been set down. He set out the parties’ positions in the litigation based on the history of dealings between them. Mr GJ says that there was a sound legal argument that Op...

7. [2018] NZEnvC 239 Mawhinney v Auckland Council [pdf, 851 KB]

   ...interest in Lot 200. Consequently, the likelihood that any consent will ever be given effect to is probably very small. [9] The before and (proposed) after areas and allotment3 numbers are shown in this Table: 2 3 Mr Mawhinney's first affidavit claims the application was lodged in February 2011. The application is undated, but it appears the Council did not accept it until November 2011. That is potentially important because the Resource Management Amendment Act 2011 came int...

8. ZA v YB LCRO 164/2013 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...sought to rely;3 [16] As Mr [ZA] had identified this file as of concern to him, a redacted version of his letter of 6 May was provided to Mr [YB] and he was invited to identify any issues he wished to raise arising from it. said he wished to file affidavit evidence in support, a synopsis of submissions and have his advocate appear at a hearing to argue the matter. Mr [ZA] observed the LCRO’s timetable appeared not to have provided for him to attend to those matters, apologised for...

9. ZA v YB LCRO 23/2014 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...sought to rely;3 [16] As Mr [ZA] had identified this file as of concern to him, a redacted version of his letter of 6 May was provided to Mr [YB] and he was invited to identify any issues he wished to raise arising from it. said he wished to file affidavit evidence in support, a synopsis of submissions and have his advocate appear at a hearing to argue the matter. Mr [ZA] observed the LCRO’s timetable appeared not to have provided for him to attend to those matters, apologised for...

10. ZA v YB LCRO 135/2014 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...sought to rely;3 [16] As Mr [ZA] had identified this file as of concern to him, a redacted version of his letter of 6 May was provided to Mr [YB] and he was invited to identify any issues he wished to raise arising from it. said he wished to file affidavit evidence in support, a synopsis of submissions and have his advocate appear at a hearing to argue the matter. Mr [ZA] observed the LCRO’s timetable appeared not to have provided for him to attend to those matters, apologised for...