6876 items matching your search terms
...Commissioner”). It was attended by Mr Shirtcliff representing himself, and Ms Tierney on behalf of the Council. On 20 June 2018 the 1 Legally described as Lot 1 DP 82810. 2 ENV-2018-CHC-4. 3 T Tierney affidavit sworn 6 November 2018, Annexure 1. 3 objection was accepted in part and the fees reduced by $3,929.79 (including GST). [8] Mr and Mrs Shirtcliff subsequently appealed the Costs Commissioner’s decision to this...
...appellant in his claim under s 63 and investigate the claim under s 65? (c) If the Court finds that ACC did not comply with ss 63 and 65, then has the claim been deemed to have been accepted by ACC under s 66? [11] Mr Hansen refers to the appellant’s affidavit of 11 May 2020. In his affidavit he deposes to the fact that on 27 March 2000 he was admitted to Taranaki Hospital by Dr White and diagnosed with type 1 diabetes as a result of Interferon treatment. [12] He said that at t...
...her application pending the outcome of these complaints but provided no response to them to the Committee and has not responded to the charges that have been filed with the Tribunal. The factual background set out below is therefore based on the affidavit evidence and inferences to be drawn from that evidence, which includes documents obtained from the Family Court file and Immigration New Zealand. 5. In about June 2007 Mr and Mrs L instructed Ms Valu-Pome’e to commence adoption proc...
...unacceptable for a practitioner and that strike off was the only proper response to the overall picture as now presented. [22] As well as the lack of candour shown by the practitioner in omitting reference to this significant relapse in her two affidavits leading up to the hearing, it was also submitted by counsel for the NSC that the behaviour itself was of serious concern. It involved a number of days of drug use with an associate. It required the practitioner to purchase uten...
...i. Administration Bond dated 24/04/1972 ii. Letters of Administration appomtmg Taniko Paahi (maternal grandmother and whangai mother) administratrix dated 11/0411972 iii. Ex Parte Motion to Lead Grant of Administration dated 2010311972 , iv. Affidavit in Support of Motion to Lead Grant of Administration sworn by Taniko Paahi dated 24/0311972 Take note that in clause 3 of Taniko's affidavit, she states that her husband left eight children namely; .Name .Also .... known~<l~...
...beneficiaries, without either of them knowing. Dr GG’s Evidence [18] In the course of the review, further evidence came to light. In June 2012 Mr HK’s lawyers submitted evidence that had not been before the Standards Committee, in the form of an affidavit by Dr GG, who had been Mrs RV’s GP for a number of years before she was hospitalised in 2001. [19] Mr HK says he was previously unaware that Dr GG had been Mrs RV’s GP, and only met him by chance at a social functio...
...ask questions for a limited period • the applicant (or their advocate) will have a further brief opportunity to clarify areas of confusion arising from the questions asked by the respondent (or their advocate). The Tribunal will only accept an affidavit or written statement prepared by the applicant themselves as it is important the Tribunal hears from the applicant in their own words. The hearings of the respondent’s and other evidence The respondent and the non-technical witnes...
...in 2006 prior to the marriage in 2011)”. [7] Rather than filing further evidence, the practitioner decided that the Family Court Judge was wrong. She also said in her evidence that her instructions were somewhat intermittent. In her earlier affidavit to the Tribunal Ms Reed said that following the ruling she asked Ms M, who was also acting on the file, under the Practitioner’s supervision, to obtain some further evidence from their client. In early May they filed a substantive...
...to the application • Identifying prospects of success • Preparing application for legal aid • Preparing ‘WITHOUT NOTICE’ application(s) for Non-Contact Order(s) against the offender and/or the offender’s associates, including any affidavit(s) in support • Considering the need for any specialist reports • Receiving minute/orders (either following in chambers or 1st Registrar’s/Judge’s list call) • Receiving Non-Contact Order(s) and determining whether Cour...
...application, then 144 hours were allegedly spent on that application. He argued that this is manifestly excessive. [33] He submitted that a quarter of the total time allegedly incurred, being 48 hours, would be more than sufficient time to prepare affidavits in opposition to a stay application and appear at a half day hearing. Applying the same percentage reduction to the Council’s claimed costs and applying the Thurlow approach results in the following range of costs awards:...