LCRO 32/2024 MP v LG (21 January 2025) [pdf, 207 KB]
...observe that there is no evidence of the applicant being incommunicative, uncooperative or dilatory in her instructions or in her compliance with the firm’s stringent administrative requirements, which I note included unnecessary compliance with AML4 requirements on an instruction that was plainly outside the scope of the AML regime. [71] The applicant’s one apparent failing was in not paying the firm’s initial invoice within the 10 working days she had agreed in the signed letter...