14330 items matching your search terms
...September 2017DOORS OPEN - 10am LAST ENTRY - 2:30pmWHERE - Main entry at 20 Lichfield Street (corner Lichfield and Durham Streets), a short walk from the Bus Interchange. This is a family-friendly event, with plenty of interactive activities which will appeal to everyone. Visit the Precinct Facebook page or the Ministry of Justice website for event information. For parking information, see: CJESP parking map
...make sure New Zealand is a safe and just society. We do this by delivering people-centred justice services to provide access to justice for all New Zealanders, including: Working with the judiciary to deliver services across the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, 58 District Courts, Coroners Court, Environment Court, Employment Court and Maori Land Court; Supporting 29 tribunals, authorities and committees that help New Zealanders resolve disputes; Providing legal assistance through t...
GE.11-41617 (E) 240311 Core document forming part of the reports of States parties New Zealand* [30 September 2010] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translations services. United Nations HRI/CORE/NZL/2010 International Human Rights Instruments Distr.: General 11 March 2011 Original: English H
...Essentially Mr Cranney submitted that on the basis of principle the current interpretation and application of the clause was found by the Authority. Legal principles [24] Counsel in their submissions referred to the caution expressed by the Court of Appeal as to reference to past decisions in the construction of a contract: Radio New Zealand Ltd v Clark [1993] 1 ERNZ 270, 271: The question arising is one of construction of contractual documents. Reference to past decisions in...
...nature of the hearing the Court has to have regard to the overall justice and equity of the matter not only as that applies to the plaintiff but also to the defendant. Discussion [36] Both counsel accepted the principle, confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Ports of Auckland Ltd v New Zealand Waterfront Workers Union, 15 that the mere possibility of a miscarriage of justice is not a sufficient ground for granting a rehearing. What is required is an actual miscarriage of justice...
...an application from the Police to lay charges under the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002. The trials of those charged are due to begin on 30 May 2011. The timing of the trials reflects the very considerable number of pre-trial applications and appeals by both prosecution and defence counsel. The New Zealand Government is still unable to comment in detail while court proceedings are still underway. Complaints to Independent Bodies 47. The Independent Police Conduct Authority is co...
...Bay (Palm Beach) or – within western Waiheke – at Oneroa Bay, Huruhi Bay and Owhanake Bay. Most of these bays (Man O’War is the obvious exception) are flanked by conventional suburban development, yet still retain a high level of aesthetic appeal and are also highly attractive from a recreation standpoint; indeed, far more so than Matiatia Bay. Much of this appeal clearly resides in a quite ‘hard edged’ interplay of headlands, promontories and rock shoals with open, sand...
...the degree of success achieved by the respondent and the time required for effective preparation. 1 Nicholls v Nicholls – Part Papaaroha 6B Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 64 (2011 APPEAL 64) 2 Riddiford v Te Whaiti (2001) 13 Takitimu Appellate MB 184 (13 ACTK 184) 3 Manuirirangi v Paraninihi Ki Waitotara Inc – Paraninihi Ki Waitotara (2002) 15 Aotea Appellate MB 64 (15 WGAP 64) 4 De Loree v Mokomoko – Hiwarau...
...jurisdiction, what costs if any, should be awarded in favour of the respondent? The jurisdiction argument [12] The applicants submit that Judge Milroy did not make any orders in respect of costs, nor were costs reserved. The respondent did not appeal that decision and it should be treated as final. [13] The applicants further submit that had Judge Milroy intended that costs would be addressed at the time any order for compensation was finalised, her judgment would have provided...
...public interest. There is now a well- established bank of precedents in this Tribunal regarding suppression, reflecting the general precedent outside this jurisdiction. [48] In R v Liddell10 the discretion to suppress was held by the Court of Appeal not to be the subject of any code or legislative prescription. Instead, when considering an application for suppression, a balancing exercise is to be undertaken, weighing the public interest in knowing against the private interests...