Search Results

1. LCRO 83/2024 AGM v CPF (24 March 2025) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...scope of review [42] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:3 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

2. LCRO 38/2025 XYZ Inc. v VNR and QBL (30 July 2025) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...“technical points” on review. What is the nature and scope of the review? [24] The High Court has said of the process of review under the Act:7 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise f...

3. 2016 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...tribunals, and some court processes. We expect the Bill to be introduced to Parliament in late 2016. The average age of cases has reduced since 2013 DISTRICT COURT CRIMINAL CATEGORY 1 CASES DISTRICT COURT CRIMINAL JURY TRIALS HIGH COURT CIVIL APPEALS HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEALS COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEALS ALL TRIBUNALS -22% -17% -33% -25% -45% -8% A nn ua l R ep or t 2 01 5– 16 11 Improve the user experience We’re particularly concerned with the experience c...

4. Trustees of the Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts v Orbell - Rowallan Block XIII Secs 1 and 5 Ahu Whenua Trusts (2015) 28 Te Waipounamu MB 37 (28 TWP 37) [pdf, 358 KB]

   ...MB 52 (2) The court may at any time, in respect of any trustee of a trust to which this section applies, enforce the obligations of his or her trust (whether by way of injunction or otherwise). [55] In Clarke v Karaitiana the Court of Appeal stated that aside from the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court conferred on the Māori Land Court by s 237, the Court also has wide supervisory and enforcement powers under s 238. 4 The Court commented at paragraph [38] that: The...

5. Ngataki v Kumete - Parish of Karaka Lot 64D (2016) 121 Waikato Maniapoto MB 184 (121 WMN 184) [pdf, 383 KB]

   121 Waikato Maniapoto MB 184 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A19990008028 A20030004701 A20030004702 UNDER Sections 24 and 315 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF PARISH OF KARAKA LOT 64D BLOCK (WHATAPAKA MARAE) AND PARISH OF KARAKA LOT 64A BLOCK (GENERAL LAND) BETWEEN TED NGATAKI AND RENA NGATAKI ON BEHALF OF THE TRUSTEES OF WHATAPAKA MARAE Applicants AND NGAHUIA KUMETE, SHARON

6. H Trust v Southern Response Earthquake Services Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0011 [pdf, 997 KB]

   ...is known as the policy standard. [42] Identifying the appropriate policy standard is the responsibility of the Court or Tribunal, using accepted methods of contractual interpretation; the correctness of that decision is challenged by lodging an appeal. Observance of the appropriate compliance standard is the responsibility of the appropriate Building Consent Authority; any decision it makes is challenged by seeking a determination from MBIE. [43] Although each policy standard is wha...

7. [2022] NZEnvC 033 Director-General of Conservation v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   Kauri Die Back IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 033 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 in relation to the package of urban services and plan changes to the Operative Whangārei District Plan AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal in respect of Kauri Dieback Hygiene provisions BETWEEN DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2020-AKL-127) A...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 85 Ramkissoon v Commissioner of New Zealand Police [pdf, 668 KB]

   DANIEL SEAN RAMKISSOON v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 85 [7 July 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 85 ARC 60/12 proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DANIEL SEAN RAMKISSOON Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: Rotorua and Tauranga 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26 and 27 August (Rotorua) and 11, 12 and 13 November (Tauranga) 2

9. LCRO 181/2023 HC v QG and VO (28 February 2025) [pdf, 413 KB]

   ...in respect of the first particular of alleged conduct the respondents relied on in giving notice of expulsion2 and ruled in favour of the respondents on the second.3 The outcome was an award affirming the validity of the expulsion. Neither party appealed the award for error of law. [7] The parties had various business entities comprising their overall business relationship as a legal practice. These were: (a) the firm itself, being an ordinary partnership of the three parties; (b)...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 93 Marshment v Shaeppard Industries Ltd [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...party’s reasonable costs of representation and disbursements. [4] The Court has a broad discretion under cl 19 of Schedule 3 to the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) but that must be exercised within the principles enunciated by the Court of Appeal in a triumvirate of cases which have subsequently been followed and applied. Those cases are Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee, 3 Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd 4 and Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly. 5 These principles...