Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 26 Benge and others v Air New Zealand [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...which it will be proved, 2 to prevent surprise and to limit and define issues. [17] As reg 11 itself emphasises, there must be a distinction between facts and evidence of the facts. Differentiating them can be problematic. As the Court of Appeal noted in Price Waterhouse v Fortex Group Ltd 3 at p13: The object of a Statement of Claim is to "state" the "claim", so that the Court knows what it is to rule upon, and the Defendant knows the case which it must...

2. Your guide to legal aid - Chinese [pdf, 874 KB]

   ...法律援助仲裁庭（Legal Aid Tribunal） – 毛利土地法庭（Māori Land Court） 10 – 难民身份处（Refugee Status Branch） – 移民与保护仲裁庭（Immigration and Protection Tribunal） – 社会保障上诉局（Social Security Appeal Authority） – 税务复核仲裁庭（Taxation Review Tribunal） – 租赁事务仲裁庭（Tenancy Tribunal）。 为了避免上法庭而进行的调解案也可能获得法律援助。 以下情况不提供民�...

3. Director of Proceedings v Emms [2013] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 165 KB]

   1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 5 Reference No. HRRT 017/2011 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND ROBERT EMMS DEFENDANT AT NELSON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haine

4. Holden & Anor as Trustees of the Estate of Bruce Morris v Hanns [2010] NZWHT Wellington 23 [pdf, 432 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-101-000109 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 23 BETWEEN ALISTER HOLDEN AND MURRAY BRIDGE AS TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF BRUCE MORRIS Claimants AND PETER HANNS TRADING AS HANNS BUILDERS & JOINERS First Respondent AND ROGER WALKER ARCHITECTS LTD Second Respondent AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND DION BARETA (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND K ROAD NO 1 LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND STOANZ LIMITED (Remo

5. 2021-05-18 Trustpower - ORC PC7 - opening submissions [pdf, 728 KB]

   Solicitor Acting: JR Welsh ChanceryGreen PO Box 47516, Ponsonby 1144 +64 9 357 0600 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-202-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the ‘Act’) AND IN THE MATTER of a notice of motion under s149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the E

6. [2019] NZEnvC 019 Willowridge Developments Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 10 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 19 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to section 120 of the Act WILLOWRIDGE DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2017 -CHC-027) Appellant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J R Jackson Environment Commissioner D J Bunting Hearing : In Chambers at Christchurch Final submissions received 12 Janua...

7. Strengthening the family justice system - Word version [docx, 1.2 MB]

   [image: ] [bookmark: _GoBack]Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excludes any and all liability of any kind to any person or entity that chooses to rely upon the information. ISBN 978-0-478-32475-

8. Strengthening the family justice system - PDF version [pdf, 2 MB]

   Strengthening the family justice system A consultation document released by the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice reforms January 2019 1 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in

9. OWRUG Updated Supplementary S Dicey Planning 24 March 2021 [pdf, 789 KB]

   ...In my opinion the substantive steps required by this policy will exclude some permit holders from this pathway altogether and will dis-incentivise others from pursuing this option – particularly if the controlled activity pathway is made more appealing. Supplementary Evidence of Planning Witnesses on Amendments to PC7 30. I agree with Mr Brass’ addition to the objective proposed for PC7 – to add the word ‘enable’ to the start of this objective for the reasons outlined in h...

10. B R L v EQC & IAG New Zealand Ltd [2020] CEIT-2020-0051 [pdf, 934 KB]

    ...I went to the trouble of advising the parties at the conclusion of the hearing of the likely outcome but am pessimistic about them using the opportunity to resolve their dispute when they can await the release of the decision and challenge it on appeal if necessary. What BRL seeks [8] BRL seeks the following declarations: (a) that the claim is over the EQC statutory cap and that EQC pay BRL $115,000 including GST, less any excess; (b) that the insured building has suffered earthqu...