Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14610 items matching your search terms

  1. 4.4 Court lists

    ...be in place. They are posted in the waiting area of the court or are available on request from court registry staff.  In many busy courts, schedules are published on electronic boards. Court lists for the senior courts – the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and High Court – are available on the Courts of New Zealand website. Family Court lists are displayed outside the Family Court rooms. The information on the court list will include identifying information and it is subject to the same rep...

  2. About the Tribunal

    ...File and Pay File and Pay provides an online alternative to filing documents and paying fees in person at a courthouse or by post. Courts that can usually accept electronic document filing and payment through File and Pay are the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal and the High Court as well as the following Tribunals: Copyright Tribunal Immigration & Protection Tribunal Legal Complaints Review Officer Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal Real Estate Disciplinary Tribunal Taxation Review Authority T...

  3. Directory of Official Information G-I [pdf, 1013 KB]

    ...established in March 2004 under the Gambling Act 2003. Functions and responsibilities The Commission is an independent statutory decision-making body established under the Gambling Act 2003. The Commission hears casino licensing applications and appeals on licensing and enforcement decisions made in relation to gaming machines and other non- casino gambling activities. The Gambling Commission has the powers of a Commission of Inquiry. Its functions are wide-ranging, and include...

  4. Butcher v NZ Transport Agency [2022] NZHRRT 21 [pdf, 586 KB]

    ...justified in a free and democratic society. [53] Part 1A does not define discrimination. Rather, what amounts to discrimination contrary to s 19 of the Bill of Rights Act has been judicially determined. That test is that set out by the Court of Appeal in Ministry of Health v Atkinson [2012] NZCA 184, [2012] 3 NZLR 456 (Atkinson) at [55], [109] and [135]-[136]: [53.1] First, there must be differential treatment or effects as between persons or groups in analogous or comparable situati...

  5. [2011] NZEmpC 101 Arkompat v Thai Chilli Co Ltd t/a Thai Chilli [pdf, 95 KB]

    ...Authority‟s determination, that does not explain adequately, or really at all, why it took a further five weeks after that to lodge a challenge. Indeed, it does indicate that both the applicant and his lawyer were then aware of the expiry of an appeal period and could be expected to have done something about it. [4] The applicant‟s case then falls back on his other ground, that of temporary impecuniosity. He says he had other debts which, presumably, he felt obliged to eithe...

  6. [2011] NZEmpC 56 Sealord Group Ltd v Service & Food Workers’ Union Nga Ringa Tota [pdf, 81 KB]

    ...The hearing, therefore, consisted solely of submissions by counsel. Principles [5] The principles to be applied in construing and applying employment agreements in cases such as this were discussed in depth by this Court and by the Court of Appeal in New Zealand Tramways and Public Transport Employees Union 1 CA 217/09, 17 December 2009. Inc v Transportation Auckland Corporation Ltd 2 and NZ Meat Workers and Related Trades Un...

  7. [2011] NZEmpC 62 Greymouth Dental Centre v Bowkett [pdf, 80 KB]

    ...v Duncan, 5 where 4 [2010] NZEmpC 24. 5 [2010] NZEmpC 36. the Court reiterated the important role that Calderbank offers play and cited Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly 6 where the Court of Appeal referred to the need for “steely responses” 7 by the Courts where claimants do not beat a Calderbank offer, as this was in the broader public interest. He also cited Gates v Air New Zealand Ltd 8 to the same effect. He submitte...

  8. [2010] NZEmpC 112 Pacific Blue Employment & Crewing Ltd v B [pdf, 34 KB]

    ...full Court decision in Air New Zealand v V.3 I note also the decisions of Judge Travis in Butcher v OCS Ltd4 and Judge Shaw in Arthur D Riley & Co v Wood.5 In both cases the Court had regard to the decision of the United Kingdom Court of Appeal in Airbus UK Ltd v Webb6 which was to the effect that all past conduct, even that which had been the subject of expired warnings, might properly be taken into account by an employer in making a decision to dismiss. Taking these more re...

  9. [2009] NZEmpC CC 18/09 Grey v Director-General of Conservation [pdf, 34 KB]

    ...One of these proceedings, in which she was the solicitor on the record for the plaintiff, was between a company known as Saxmere Co Ltd which, together with others, had brought proceedings against the Wool Board Disestablishment Co Ltd. On an appeal from the Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court, Ms Grey purported to add the Attorney-General as a new party to the proceeding. That came to the notice of the Solicitor-General whose communication about it to the defendant began the chai...