Search Results

1. ENV-2020-AKL-000091

   Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000091 Hamilton City Council v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Council Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited Federated Farmers of New Zealand Genesis Energy Limited Graeme Gleeson Hauraki District Council Landcorp Farming Limited Matamata-Piako District Council OJI Fibre Solutions NZ Limited Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated South Waikato District Council Taupo District Council Waikato District Council...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Environment Court cases online >
   3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1

2. ENV-2020-AKL-000092

   Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000092 South Waikato District Council v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Council Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited Dairy NZ Limited Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited Genesis Energy Limited Graeme Gleeson Hauraki District Council Hamilton City Council Landcorp Farming Limited Matamata-Piako District Council OJI Fibre Solutions NZ Limited Otorohanga District Council Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Environment Court cases online >
   3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1

3. [2018] NZEnvC 183 Port Otago Ltd v Otago Regional Council [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...protecting and providing for the functional needs of lifeline utilities and Policy 3.2.4(a) PORPS. Others relate to the role of surf breaks in relation to natural character, e.g. policies 3.1 .11 PORPS; 3.2.8 PORPS. Policy 3.2.11 PORPS. Glossary (appeals version) p 208. It is also a lifeline utility under the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2001. Dated 6 July 2018. For ease of reference we have numbered the sub-policies as (1) and (2) . 16 essential or emergency services;...

4. Deputy Registrar v Moeahu – Lot 1 DP 17494 Part Section 2345 New Plymouth (Old Railway Station) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 3 (437 AOT 3) [pdf, 550 KB]

   437 Aotea MB 3 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20170004318 WĀHANGA Under Sections 67, 231, 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Lot 1 DP 17494 Part Section 2345 New Plymouth (Old Railway Station) and Other Blocks I WAENGA I A Between ME And ME And DEPUTY REGISTRAR Te Kaitono Appl

5. Pou - Eru Moka and Te Owai Pou Whanau Trust (2013) 61 Taitokerau MB 247 (61 TTK 247) [pdf, 258 KB]

   ...descendants of Eru and Te Owai Pou as “the whānau”. 1 See the discussion in Ruapuha and Uekaha Hapu Trust v Norman Tane – Hauturu East 8 Block (2010) 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 512 (2010 APPEAL 512) at [86]-[96] where the Court addressed the application of s 354 of the 1993 Act to s 438 of the 1953 Act, whereby trusts constituted under s 438 are ahu whenua trusts for the purpose of the 1993 Act. 61 Taitokerau MB 250 [...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 67 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...Toiora PHO. She also has extensive experience in working with urban authorities and iwi. Ms Moxon has extensive gov- ernance experience with local and national organisations, including the Early Learning Management Taskforce, the Social Security Appeal Authority, the National Urban Māori Authority, Te Rūnanga o Kirikiriroa, Waikato DHB Iwi Māori Council and Ngāti Pahauwera Development Trust. She has also served on Trust Waikato, Habitat for Humanity and Philanthropy New Zealand...

7. LCRO 104/2019 RY v DN (1 May 2020) [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...scope of review [43] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which has said of the process of review under the Act:4 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for...

8. Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...The evidence establishes the contract with TQ was for labour only. [38] The Tribunal has found that both the first and third respondents were the developers of this property. In Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson6 at [241], the Court of Appeal held that a developer had an absolute duty which is non-delegable. Cooke J stated that a development company has a duty to see that proper care and skill are exercised in the building of houses and that it cannot be avoided by del...

9. Proactive release - Sexual violence response [pdf, 7.7 MB]

   ...to Government agencies, noting the Law Commission consulted extensively in developing its recommendations. Feedback from the defence bar about these changes again reflects concerns about the potential erosion of fair trial rights, and the risk of appeals and re- trials undermining the expected benefits to complainants. Financial implications 94. Agencies have advised they will be unable to absorb the costs of implementing my recommended overall package of proposals from within baseline...

10. Proactive release - Improving the justice response to victims of sexual violence [pdf, 7.7 MB]

    ...to Government agencies, noting the Law Commission consulted extensively in developing its recommendations. Feedback from the defence bar about these changes again reflects concerns about the potential erosion of fair trial rights, and the risk of appeals and re- trials undermining the expected benefits to complainants. Financial implications 94. Agencies have advised they will be unable to absorb the costs of implementing my recommended overall package of proposals from within baseline...