Search Results

1. Nicholls v Nicholls - Part Papaaroha 6B Block [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 64 (2011 APPEAL 64) [pdf, 93 KB]

   NICHOLLS V NICHOLLS MAC 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 64 15 February 2011 IN THE MAORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 64 (2011 APPEAL 64) A20100007624 UNDER Section 79 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Part Papaaroha 6B Block BETWEEN GEORGE TAMA NICHOLLS Appellant AND VIV TAMA NICHOLLS Respondent Hearing: 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 435, 16 August 2010 (Heard at Ham...

2. ENV-2016-AKL-000212 Smithies Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...unduly prejudice the Trust. 3. The Trust provides further details of the reasons for its appeal below. 4. The Trust is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMAff). 5. The decision being appealed against was made by the Council. The Trust received notice of the Council's decision on 19 August 2016. 6. BACKGROUND AND ISSUES CONCERNING COUNCIL PRACTICE RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL The Trust 6.1 The Trust owns a property at...

3. Tata v Tata - Waiwhakaata 3E 4C Lot 2A Block (Hiiona Marae) [2020] Maori Appellate Court MB 166 (2020 Appeal166) [pdf, 427 KB]

   2020 Māori Appellate Court MB 166 I TE KOOTI PĪRA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO In the Māori Appellate Court of New Zealand Waikato-Maniapoto District A20180009413, APPEAL 2018/23 A20190001839, APPEAL 2019/1 WĀHANGA Under Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Waiwhakaata 3E 4C Lot 2A Block (Hiiona Marae) I WAENGA I A Between DAVID TATA Te Kaipīra Tuatahi First Appellant ME...

4. IR v ST LCRO 203 / 2010 (9 March 2012) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...account, and that therefore relationship property should be divided equally. 2 [4] In the first Family Court judgment, Judge Strettell determined that there should be unequal sharing in the proportion of 65% (Ms IS) and 35% (Mr IR). [5] Mr IR appealed that judgment to the High Court, initially acting on his own behalf. Part way through proceedings however he instructed Mr IU, a barrister briefed on instructions from Mr IV. [6] The appeal was only allowed in part, and the...

5. IPT Practice Note 5 Publication of decisions [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...5/2016 (PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS) March 2016 PRACTICE NOTE 5/2016 (PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS) PREAMBLE 1. COMMENCEMENT 2. JURISDICTION PROVISIONS RELATING TO DIFFERENT STREAMS 3. REFUGEE AND PROTECTION APPEALS 4. RESIDENCE APPEALS 5. DEPORTATION (NON-RESIDENT) APPEALS 6. DEPORTATION (RESIDENT) APPEALS THE PUBLICATION PROCESS 7. THE PROCESS OF DEPERSONALISATION, ABRIDGEMENT AND PROHIBITION FROM PUBLICATION 8. REVIEW OF ‘PUBLICATIO...

6. Morgan v Accident Compensation Corporation [2018] NZACA 2 [pdf, 151 KB]

   ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND [2018] NZACA 2 ACA 3/2018 Carolyn Morgan Applicant Accident Compensation Corporation Respondent Before: D J Plunkett Counsel for the Applicant: Self-represented Counsel for the Respondent: A Barnett Date of Decision: 16 July 2018 __________________________________________________________________ DECISION __________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCT...

7. Media guide for reporting in the courts and tribunals [pdf, 560 KB]

   ...Authorities Court of Appeal High Court District Court Family Civil Criminal Youth Employment Court Environment Court Coroners Court Waitangi Tribunal Employment Relations Authority Māori Land Court Māori Appellate Court Court Martial Appeals Court Court Martial Supreme Court New Zealand’s general courts are structured like a pyramid, with the Supreme Court at the top. Below, is the Court of Appeal, the High Court and the District Courts. These are ‘courts...

8. Media guide for reporting in the courts and tribunals [pdf, 804 KB]

   ...Authorities Court of Appeal High Court District Court Family Civil Criminal Youth Employment Court Environment Court Coroners Court Waitangi Tribunal Employment Relations Authority Māori Land Court Māori Appellate Court Court Martial Appeals Court Court Martial Supreme Court New Zealand’s general courts are structured like a pyramid, with the Supreme Court at the top. Below, is the Court of Appeal, the High Court and the District Courts. These are ‘courts...

9. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Todd Property Group Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...the PAUP. 3. Todd Property provides further details of the reasons for its appeal below. 4. Todd Property is not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("RMA"). 5. The decision being appealed was made by the Council and Todd Property received notice of the Council's decision on 19 August 2016. Part of the decision appealed 6. The parts of the Council's decision Todd Property is appealing all relate to the Urban...

10. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Ron and Hannah Dunlop Family Trusts v Auckland Council [pdf, 769 KB]

    ...17 Worley Place StJohns Auckland ron@multiform.co. nz 095277752 Contact person: Ron Dunlop ENV-2016-AKL- of Ihe Local Governmenl (Auckland Transilional Provisions) Acl 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal under section 156(1) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Proposed Plan) of Proposed...