Search Results

1. Complaints Assessment Committee 403 v Misa [2018] NZREADT 37 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...provide that Mr Misa is to complete the specified further education within six months of the date of the Tribunal’s decision. [5] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. __________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson __________________ Ms C Sandelin Member...

2. [2017] NZEnvC 093 Golden Bay Grandstand v Heritage New Zealand [pdf, 48 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC O~ 3 of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal under section 58 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMMUNITY TRUST (INCORPORATED) (ENV-2016-WLG-000065) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application under section 316 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAN...

3. BORA Accident Compensation (Notice of Decisions) Amendment Bill [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...a review of its decision that a claimant’s injury is an aggravation or re-injury of a work-related personal injury, and extending to employers the entitlement to be present and heard at a review hearing; and c. providing that an employer may appeal to the District Court against a review decision that an injury is an aggravation or re-injury of a work-related personal injury. 3. We have concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bil...

4. 2023-05-19-Form-33-Te-Ao-Turoa-Environmental-Centre-Rangitane-o-Manawatu.pdf [pdf, 414 KB]

   ...1. I am a person who made a submission about the subject matter of the proceedings. 2. I am not a trade competitor for the purposes of section 308C of the Resource Management Act 1991. 3. I am directly affected by an effect of the subject of the appeal that- a) adversely affects the environment; and b) does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. 4. I am interested in all of the proceedings. 5. I am interested in the following particular issues arising fro...

5. ENV-2020-AKL-000088

   Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000088 Iwi of Hauraki v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited CNI Iwi Land Management Limited Federated Farmers of New Zealand Mercury NZ Limited Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated South Waikato District Council Waikato River and Waipa River Iwi Waikato River Authority Waipa District Council Wairakei Pastoral Limited

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Environment Court cases online >
   3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1

6. Ministry wins Empowerment Award for Women's Network

   ...would support all our women, no matter what their role, education, age, ethnicity, or location. ‘We recognise that our women have different aspirations, different life stories, and we come from a range of cultural and ethnic backgrounds. We need to appeal to a wide range of interests and reflect the diversity of our Ministry,’ she says. Watch the video made about the network and find out more about our winning award on the Diversity Works website. Find out more about the Women’s network...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. News

7. Ministry-of-Justice-Annual-Report-2024-25.pdf [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   Annual Report 2024/25 Ministry of Justice | Te Tāhū o te Ture Including the Annual Report for The Office of Treaty Settlements and Takutai Moana: Te Tari Whakatau And Ministers’ reports on Non-Departmental Appropriations: Minister of Justice (Vote Justice), Minister for Courts (Vote Courts), Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations and Minister for Māori Crown Relations: Te Arawhiti (Vote Te Arawhiti) E.64, B14 AR (2025) In accordance with the Public Finance Act 1989, this

8. D v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2022] CEIT-2020-0014 [pdf, 619 KB]

   ...case. I do not consider that the ruling in Sleight applies to this case. [104] There is no suggestion that WD would not consider this matter finalised based on what I order IAG to pay for his property under the Policy, and subject to his right to appeal this decision. That is, it is WD who seeks a lump sum to finalise his claims against IAG once and for all, as opposed to wanting to hold IAG liable for further as yet unclaimed payments as the repair progresses. My decision is a judi...

9. [2011] NZEmpC 132 Kaipara v CHH Ltd [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...upheld the jurisdiction to make an order for security, citing Watson v Fell 2 and Koia v Attorney- General in respect of the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Justice. 3 He also cited A S McLachlan Ltd v MEL Network Ltd, 4 where the Court of Appeal stated that the exercise of the discretion whether to order security should not be fettered by applying any principles but instead the Court must assess the circumstances of the particular case on the basis that access to the Courts f...

10. [2010] NZEmpC 145 Young v Bay of Plenty DHB [pdf, 32 KB]

    ...prepare a challenge to the Authority’s determination or, alternatively, that he instructed his solicitor to file a challenge within time. There is no suggestion that either Mr Young or his solicitor was unaware of, or mistaken about, the 28 day appeal period. There is no explanation as to the impossibility or even difficulty of communication with Mr Young while he was attending a conference in Israel. Commonsense dictates that in such circumstances it may generally be expected...