14617 items matching your search terms
[2012] NZACA 15 ACA 8/11 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN EDMOND CHALECKI Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Dunedin on 6 September 2012 APPEARANCES Mr Forst...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 9 READT 006/2020 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN HE DUAN Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1901) First Respondent On the papers Tribunal Hon P J Andrews, Chairperson Mr G Denley, Member Ms C Sandelin, Member Submissions filed by Mr Duan, appellant Ms Lim, on behalf...
...legislation. This ground related to subsequent inconsistent notices affecting the validity of the essential notices of lockout that Spotless had been required to give. I refer to this as “the subsequent notice” issue in the case. [4] All parties appealed and all were successful in a judgment issued by the Court of Appeal on 22 December 2008. The Court of Appeal directed this Court to re-hear and reconsider the question of the lawfulness of what it concluded were lockouts impo...
( iBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision : Date of Issue: Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC ,Lt b IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 19911 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 171 of the Act BETWEEN PANMURE FISH & CHIPS (ENV-2018-AKL-066) Appellant AND AUCKLAND TRANSPORT Requiring Authority Environment Judge JA Smith Environment Commissioner JA Hodges 20 August 2018 G Lanning and RJ O'...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 197 ACR 101/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN CARLOS FERRARI FRANCISCO ALVES Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 28 November 2023 Held at: Wellington/Whanganui-a-tara by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented C Hlavac and M G...
(2024) NZSSAA 08 Reference No. SSAA 72/22 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY R Palu Chairperson J Ryall Member Date of hearing: 2 November 2023 Appearances: [Appellant’s advocate], and XXXX N Jaura, appeals officer, for the Ministry of Social Development (with R West, lawyer, observi...
...Respondent Hearing: 4 February 2013 Court: Panckhurst J Chisholm J Whata J Counsel: R A Peters for Appellant G H Nation for Respondent Judgment: 28 February 2013 JUDGMENT OF FULL COURT A Time is extended and leave to appeal against penalty granted. B The appeal is dismissed. C Costs are reserved. Introduction [1] On 24 November 2011 the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal (the Tribunal) made an order that the ap...
...Auckland's Westhaven Marina by extending the north-western breakwater and causeway (via land reclamation) to create public open space, a carpark area for public and private use, and access to new marina berths (Project). [2] The consent was appealed by Ngati Whatua Orakei Whaia Maia Limited (Ngati Whatua Orakei). The basis of the appeal is in relation to mana whenua issues and the following parties joined the appeal under s 274 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act): Bac...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 001 ACR 119/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN CHRISTOPHER O’NEILL Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Submissions: The Appellant is self-represented B Johns and A Lane for the Respondent Hearing: On the papers...
...We directed the registrar to arrange a telephone conference of the parties with the Chairperson to deal with penalty. [2] There have been two such telephone conferences and the counsel for the defendant advise they shall forthwith be filing an appeal against our misconduct decision . In that case they submit that it is appropriate for the consideration of penalty to be deferred pending the decision on appeal by the High Court. Their reasons for that submission are that the defendant...