14610 items matching your search terms
...Regional Council - Waikato Regional Policy Statement ENV-2023-313-000048 1. i. Topic: Topic Number: Hamilton City Council v Waikato Regional Council Appeal By Submitter On Proposed Policy Statement Or Plan pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 Court Reference: ENV-2024-AKL-000007
...Right Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) is established under the Human Rights Act 1993 (the Act) and comprises a Chairperson, Deputy Chairpersons and Panel Members, two of whom are appointed for each hearing of the Tribunal and may also be appointed to hear appeals to the High Court. The Tribunal hears and determines proceedings under the Human Rights Act, the Privacy Act 2020 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 after complaints have first been dealt with by the Human Rights Commis...
...without a party being there, if that party fails to attend without good reason. The decision The judge will issue a written decision, generally 5 to 6 weeks from the hearing date. You’ll be sent a copy. If you’re unhappy with the decision, you can appeal to the High Court.
...to do something, or stop doing something. Decisions on access requests: The Commissioner will make binding decisions on complaints about access to information, rather than the Human Rights Review Tribunal. The Commissioner’s decisions can be appealed to the Tribunal. Strengthening cross-border protections: New Zealand agencies will have to take reasonable steps to ensure that personal information sent overseas is protected by comparable privacy standards. The Act also clarifies that whe...
Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000100 Waikato and Waipa River Iwi v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Council Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited Dairy NZ Limited Director-General of Conservation Federated Farmers of New Zealand Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited G Pinnell Graeme Gleeson Horticulture New Zealand Matamata-Piako District Council Miraka Limited OJI Fibre Solutions NZ Limited Potatoes NZ Incorporated Pukekohe Vegetable Growers Association Royal Forest a...
...balance of convenience favours the granting of the injunction; (e) That the overall justice of the case favours the granting of the injunction. 7 Was the restraint reasonable? [22] Mr Gallie advised that the defendant does not intend to cross-appeal but will wish at the substantive investigation to contend strongly that the restraint was unreasonable and therefore unenforceable. For present interim purposes however, he accepted that the plaintiff had established as a serious...
...room. [32] In terms of the legal position, Ms Rush submitted that the decisions the plaintiff made were made honestly and that any adverse effect on employment was not foreseen. Ms Rush relied upon and cited various passages from the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Auckland City Council v New Zealand Public Service Association Inc. 11 In reliance on a statement made at [25] of the Auckland City Council judgment, Ms Rush submitted: The Plaintiff cannot be reasonably required...
...rapid technological development of which the general field of photography, both still and moving, is a prime example. [27] As Mr McBride submitted, courts take account of these realities. In Frucor Beverages Ltd v Rio Beverages Ltd 2 the Court of Appeal noted: … the Court should strive to arrive at a meaning which gives effect to [Parliament’s] intention. The principles of interpretation which assist the Courts in that exercise are well established. They reflect commonsense...
...decision would issue in due course concerning the validity of Mr Koopu’s resignation and the issues arising from that event. As foreshadowed, I issued my decision on Mr Koopu’s resignation on 12 March 2014. 3 That judgment was not subject to appeal or review. [7] On 2 May 2014 a further hearing was held and it was greed that a special general meeting of shareholders would be convened on 21 June 2014. 4 The meeting was to be overseen by an independent facilitator. 5 I then b...
...under this Part the court shall appoint 1 or more responsible trustees, and may appoint 1 or more advisory trustees and 1 or more custodian trustees. 36 Takitimu MB 194 [29] A leading authority on the appointment of trustees is the Court of Appeal decision Clarke v Karaitiana where it was said: 17 [51] The touchstone is s 222(2) itself. In appointing a trustee, the Court is obliged to have regard to the ability, experience and knowledge of the individual concerned. In...