14618 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2018] NZREADT 21 READT 008/18 IN THE MATTER OF An Appeal under Section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ANDREI KOZLOV Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 416) First Respondent AND SUSAN HALL and RICHARD LINDSAY Second Respondents On the papers: Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson) Ms C Sandelin (Member) Mr N O’C...
...whānau homestead where Ms Henry resides. The order was to take effect seven days from the oral decision. [2] On 25 February 2021 counsel for Barry Peihopa filed an application seeking a stay of the injunction order. Counsel signaled that an appeal to the Māori Appellate Court would be filed, and this occurred on 25 February 2021. [3] I set the matter down for an urgent judicial conference on 26 February 2021 at the request of counsel for Barry Peihopa and received submi...
...for review is refused. B: There is no order as to costs on this application. 2 REASONS Introduction [1] The applicant, Thi Lan Anh Tran (Mrs Tran), applies a second time for review of the Court’s decision1 refusing her appeal under s 174 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) against a decision of City Rail Link Ltd (CRLL) as a requiring authority on its notice of requirement in respect of the Auckland City Rail Link. [2] The Court in that case was con...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZREADT 12 Reference No: READT 028/2021 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN DC Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2106) First Respondent AND NC Second Respondent Hearing on the papers Tribunal: Ms C Sandelin (Deputy Chairperson) Mr G Denley (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member) Submissions received fr...
BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZREADT 34 Reference No: READT 004/2023 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN IX Appellant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2102) Respondent Hearing on the papers Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) P N O’Connor (Member) F J Mathieson (Member) Representation: Counsel for the appellant: K Burkhart, M Russell C...
Waikato Regional Airport Limited v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 067 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WAIKATO REGIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-000075) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Ac...
...IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 067 ACAR 123/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER SECTION 162(1) OF THE ACT BETWEEN BN Applicant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Submissions: J Copland for the Applicant F Becroft and L Hawes-Gandar for the...
...and was eventually cancelled. Q Ltd brought a claim in the Tribunal for payment of money it said was owing by OU under the contract, and OU filed a counterclaim. In 2021, the Tribunal made an order that OU was to pay Q Ltd $8,697.02. That order was appealed to the District Court and the appeal was dismissed. 2. In this claim OU has made a claim for payment of damages of $30,000.00. Her claims are: a. that Q Ltd has breached consumer legislation, such as the Consumer Guarantees Act an...
FONH v MDC – DECISION AS TO SCOPE IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 255 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN FRIENDS OF NELSON HAVEN AND TASMAN BAY INC (ENV-2020-CHC-33) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: at Christchurch on 8 October 2024...
...Commissioners are appointed for a term of up to 5 years on either a full or 75% time basis. Deputy Commissioners sit as required usually on the basis of their expertise. E.49 7 The court’s functions are primarily to determine, appeals in respect of resource consents, designations and abatement notices, plan appeals in respect of the content of regional and district planning instruments, applications for enforcement orders, and inquiries in respect of water conservat...