Search Results

1. LCRO 175/2020 PM obo MNO Limited v FS and BL (22 April 2021) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...scope of review [45] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:11 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

2. LCRO 190/2020 JG v VK (23 March 2021) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...scope of review [37] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:2 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

3. LCRO 152/2016 BL v HJ (11 August 2017) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...scope of review [31] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:16 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

4. LCRO 195/2017 LH v SR and HP (19 March 2019) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...scope of review [36] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

5. 2019 01 28 March Outstanding Applications [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...216-222 on 19 March 2015 - Application to the Chief Judge A20180008889 58/93 Riki Ngatoki, Hayward Brown Ngaiotonga A3 - and a decision to dismiss an injunction application at 181 Taitokerau MB 165-184 dated 24 September 2018.- Notice of Appeal A20180009091 45/93 Rau Trevor Brown Te Irihanga 2A Block & 6 others - and a transfer of shares made at 31 Waikato-Maniapoto MB 180-191 on 25 October 2011 - Application to the Chief Judge A20180009151 45/93 Lydia Fl...

6. LCRO 168/2017 AH v OS and VI (21 December 2018) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...scope of review [48] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:2 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

7. Marywil Investments Ltd v North Shore Ctiy Council [pdf, 65 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2008-100-000031 BETWEEN MARYWIL INVESTMENTS LIMITED as Trustee of the MARYWIL TRUST Claimant AND NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND MURRAY AITKEN Second Respondent AND PLASTER SYSTEMS LIMITED Third Respondent AND RICHARD POTTER Fourth Respondent AND MW AITKEN ENTERPRISES LIMITED Fifth Respondent AND HENDRIK KANON Sixth Respondent Hearing: 9 and 10 June 2009 Appearances: S Thodey and R Karal

8. [2016] NZEmpC 129 Maharaj v Wesley Wellington Mission Inc [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...Contracts Act 1991, which applied when that case was decided, and frivolous in cl 15 should be equated with futile. In STAMS the proceeding before the Court was considered frivolous because it was misconceived. It was misconceived because the appeal in that case had not survived a settlement negotiated in the lead-up to trial. Mr Dearing submitted that, applying this approach, the same outcome should be reached in relation to Mr Maharaj’s proceeding. Mr Maharaj had settled his c...

9. LCRO 272/2016 XK v JB (24 June 2019) [pdf, 346 KB]

   ...scope of review [65] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:14 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for th...

10. LCRO 243/2016 KE v HO (21 June 2019) [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...scope of review [33] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:3 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...