Search Results

1. [2024] NZLVT 057 – Dobbie v Far North District Council (31 October 2024) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...the incorrect notice of valuation. In knowledge of this error both parties have consented to the Tribunal finalising the objection. I take this to be a voluntary submission to jurisdiction agreeing to the incorrect notice for the purposes of this appeal only. I conclude there is nothing to prevent such mutual waiver where there is no injustice to any party to resolve a genuine valuation issue. Given that the parties have agreed on an appropriate valuation for the properties, I wi...

2. Australian registration in New Zealand

   ...close enough to the work you did in Australia. We may set conditions on your licence or certificate. You must also follow any conditions on your Australian registration. We may make enquiries about your Australian jurisdiction where you are registered. Appealing our decision If you are unhappy with our decision, you can get it reviewed by the Trans-Tasman Occupations Tribunal. The tribunal can review our decision to: set conditions on you postpone your registration refuse your registration. T...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Licences & certificates >
   3. Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority >
   4. Apply or renew

3. Reparation information for victims

   ...because the court does not receive funding for advance reparation payments, and New Zealand law does not allow them. Back to top Changes to reparation Sometimes changes are made to reparation after the order has been made, for example if: the sentence is appealed the offender cannot pay the terms for payment change the reparation gets replaced by another type of sentence. Changes to reparation can only be made by a judge. We’ll send you a letter if there are any changes to your reparation....

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About reparation

4. About the Employment Court

   ...present) Established by the Employment Contracts Act 1991 the Court, together with the Employment Tribunal, had exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine proceedings founded on an employment contract. It had both an appellate jurisdiction to hear appeals against Employment Tribunal decisions and a first instance jurisdiction including injunctive relief, plus the common law remedy of wrongful dismissal. The Employment Court continues under the Employment Relations Act 2000 with jurisdiction t...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court

5. About the Tribunal

   ...https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/about-tenancy-services/contact-us/ District Court case officers: support the tribunal and the adjudicators liaise with the people involved once an application is received at the court manage applications for adjournments (delays to hearings) manage applications for rehearings and appeals. Applications that are scheduled for a hearing are transferred to the relevant District Court House, where your case is being heard, 5 days before the hearing. If you have a query...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Tenancy

6. Ward v Maccol Developments Ltd [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...Accordingly, the insuperable problem the Owners face is that unless a “reasonable discoverability test” could be held to apply to the accrual date, the Owners’ claim in contract is statute barred. [64] Mr Rooney submits that there is Court of Appeal authority to the effect that where the contractual duty is not to cause damage by negligence, which he further submitted was the case here, the cause of action accrues at the date of the damage (Day v Mead [1987] 2NZLR 443 at...

7. [2023] NZEmpC 101 GF v Comptroller of Customs [pdf, 513 KB]

   ...Governments have signed future Governments up to a range of new exemplary conduct) but the point does not need to be decided in the context of this case. 23 Armstrong v Attorney-General [1995] 1 ERNZ 43 (EmpC). The decision was overturned on appeal but not on this point: Attorney-General v Armstrong [1996] 1 ERNZ 344 (CA). See too NZ Educational Institute v Board of Trustees of Auckland Normal Intermediate School [1992] 3 ERNZ 243 (EmpC) at 269. 24 Employment Relations Act 20...

8. Statistical bulletin: An overview of conviction and sentencing statisitcs in New Zealand 2000 to 2009 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...1 The data used in this report was extracted from the Justice Data Warehouse on 31 May 2010. 2 www.stats.govt.nz/methods_and_services/access-data/TableBuilder 3 This diagram does not include appeal or review processes. http://www.stats.govt.nz/methods_and_services/access-data/TableBuilder STATISTICAL BULLETIN: CONVICTION AND SENTENCING STATISTICS 3 Figure 2: Number of prosecuted charges, 2000–2009 Prosecution outcome refer

9. [2010] NZEmpC 94 Hutton & ors V Provencocadmus Ltd (In Receivership) & ors [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...their appointment, the receivers had sent them notices of immediate termination, it was held by 5 (3rd ed, Lexis Nexis, Wellington, 2008). 6 At 11.12. 7 [1998] 1 NZLR 30. the Court of Appeal that the notices were lawfully given under s 32(1)(b) and relieved the receivers of personal liability. Once a notice has been lawfully given to an employee under s 32(1)(b) within the 14 days (or any extended period ordered by the Cour...

10. EMPC Document bundle example [pdf, 125 KB]

    ...investigate the problem and issue a determination. • If one or other of the parties is not happy with the Employment Relations Authority’’s determination, they can refer the problem to the Employment Court. In limited cases, there is a right to appeal a decision of the Employment Court to the Court of Appeal. Personal Grievances If the problem is a personal grievance, then the Employee must raise it within 90 days of when the facts that give rise to the grievance occur or come...