Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 103 Beadle v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.6 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 103 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PETER, JILLIAN AND SIMON BEADLE (ENV-2018-CHC-156) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 10 June 2019 Date of Issue: 10 June 2019 FINAL DECISION OF T...

2. Trustpower - EiC - S Styles - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 505 KB]

   ...way that recognises their functional needs which include certainty of supply for periods longer 13 Partially Operative Otago Regional Policy Statement 2019, version showing changes as a result of appeals, Policy 4.4.1 (track changes removed). 14 Partially Operative Otago Regional Policy Statement 2019, version showing changes as a result of appeals, Policy 4.4.3 (track changes removed). 15 Partially Operative Otago Regional Policy Stateme...

3. D (D G Family Trust) v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2019] CEIT-2019-0037 [pdf, 605 KB]

   ...unnecessary costs.29 [28] That confirms my conclusion at [22] that the Tribunal’s costs provisions are intended to ensure access to justice, by discouraging bad behaviour and promoting compromise. [29] As an examination of the WHT costs decisions and appeals will reveal, costs can be just as easily awarded against applicants as against respondents; it is a wind that blows in both directions. It needs to be understood, however, that claimants representing themselves may not be hel...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 84 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Jeet Holdings Ltd [pdf, 555 KB]

   ...because that fact was not drawn to the attention of the Court. Subsequently insolvency proceedings were instituted. The High Court decided it was appropriate to continue to consider them, relying on its inherent jurisdiction. [21] The case was appealed. By the time the appeal was heard by the Court of Appeal the defendant had been restored to the Register. The Court of Appeal specifically mentioned the unusual situation that had arisen in the High Court, where orders were made...

5. Review of the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 Post Consultation Decisions [pdf, 993 KB]

   ...the courts Equity Moderate to low- more room for discretion in judicial decision-making. No parameters for negotiations Certainty Low- long period of uncertainty likely until common law established Efficiency Low- protracted litigation and appeals likely. No parameters or basis for negotiations provided. PROVIDE GUIDENCE IN LEGISLATION Reflects Treaty of Waitangi Moderate- allows for unique New Zealand common law to develop to a certain extent Good faith Moderate–...

6. LCRO 35/2024 UX v RT (19 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...scope of review [46] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:5 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

7. Regulatory Impact Assessments

   ...of Justice. It provides analysis of options to reform and modernise criminal procedure developed by the Criminal Procedure (Simplification) Project. October 2010. RIA - Criminal Procedure Simplification Regulatory Impact Assessment: Fee for lodging appeals to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal The Ministry is tasked with the setting of an appropriate fee for the lodging of appeals to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (IPT). October 2010. RIA - Fee for lodging appeals to the Immigrat...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Regulatory stewardship

8. 2017 Ministry of Justice Annual Report [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   ...HOW_ these perspectives help to guide us as we deliver our services. 8 ANNUAL REPORT 2016–17 ANNUAL REPORT 2016–17 9 WE DELIVER COURT AND TRIBUNAL SERVICES. We work with the Judiciary to deliver court services for the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, District Court, the Environment Court, Employment Court, Māori Land Court and Waitangi Tribunal. We support other tribunals, authorities and committees (including the Disputes Tribunal and Tenancy Tribunal) that help New ...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 167 Director-General of Conservation v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 6.6 MB]

   ...Director-General of Conservation v Northland Regional Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 167 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against a decision granting resource consent application for taking groundwater from various aquifer sub- units of the Aupōuri Aquifer, Northland BETWEEN DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2021-AKL-129) Appellant AND...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 40 B v Virgin Australia (NZ) Employment & Crewing Ltd [pdf, 356 KB]

    B V VIRGIN AUSTRALIA (NZ) EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED, PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC BLUE EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED NZEmpC CHCH [2013] NZEmpC 40 [20 March 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2013] NZEmpC 40 CRC 6/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN B Plaintiff AND VIRGIN AUSTRALIA (NZ) EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING LIMITED, PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS PACIFIC BLUE EMPLOYMENT AND CREWING L