Search Results

1. Takimoana - Te Tii (Waitangi) B3 Ahu Whenua Trust (2014) 90 Taitokerau MB 67 (90 TTK 67) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...of promoting retention and utilisation of the land by the owners. 8 Rameka v Hall [2013] NZAR 1208 (CA). 9 Larkins v Kaitaia – Waihou Hutoia D2A Block [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 159 (2013 APPEAL 159). 10 Re Schroder’s Wills Trusts [2004] 1 NZLR 695. 90 Taitokerau MB 76 [34] In support of this argument Mr Peters produced a commentary in the form of a summary chart from the Westlaw NZ Electronic Library 11 Mr Pete...

2. [2018] NZEnvC 066 Hamilton City Council [pdf, 20 MB]

   ...enable a range of urban activities occurring on the TGH and CPL land which were still prohibited by the UEPA Overlay by virtue of the rural zoning of the land. [23] The Council decided to reject the private plan change request. [24] TGH and CPL appealed this decision to the Environment Court. The appeal was later withdrawn, because TGH and CPL decided to ask the Minister for the Environment to determine that their project was a proposal of national significance. The Board of Inqui...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 101 Pascoe v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA - the Government Agency responsible for the Project) obtained approval of resource consents and a notice of requirement under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) allowing the Project from the Environment Court on appeals by way of an interim decision dated 18 December 2019 (the interim decision), a final assessment dated 10 March 2021 and a final decision dated 1 April 2021 (the final decision).1 [4] This decision addresses the Pascoes’ objection...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 101 Pascoe v Minister for Land Information [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA - the Government Agency responsible for the Project) obtained approval of resource consents and a notice of requirement under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) allowing the Project from the Environment Court on appeals by way of an interim decision dated 18 December 2019 (the interim decision), a final assessment dated 10 March 2021 and a final decision dated 1 April 2021 (the final decision).1 [4] This decision addresses the Pascoes’ objection...

5. Wilson - Oue 2B 2C [2025] Chief Judge's MB 185 (2025 CJ 185) [pdf, 976 KB]

   ...already finalised or pending 8 Previous Court hearings before confirmation made - 36 Whangarei MB 227 and 261-268. 2025 Chief Judge's MB 198 (1) No order made by the Chief Judge under section 44, or made by the Appellate Court on appeal from any such order, shall take away or affect any right or interest acquired for value and in good faith under any instrument of alienation registered before the making of any such order. 42. Given that Arepata Ringa Kopa, Reo Wirihan...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 295 Cooper v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 803 KB]

   Cooper v Kaipara District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 295 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN ALMA AND PETER COOPER, AMY AND GREG CRAMOND, NIKKI HARRIS, SUSAN HODKINSON, NATASHA AND JOHN LEE, JONATHAN AND PATRICIA MCKINNEY (ENV-2022-AKL-000142) Appellants AND KAIPARA DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND VERMONT STREET PARTNERS LIMITED...

7. 2020-04-09-Plan-Changes-1-8-s-32-Evaluation-Report.pdf [pdf, 737 KB]

   ...Change 8 to the Water Plan and Proposed Plan Change 1 to the Waste Plan 9 April 2020 Page 5 April 2020 to 1 April 2026 to provide time for the longer-term planning processes to occur. Council made a final decision on PC6AA on 8 February 2020 and no appeals have yet been received. An additional plan change, Proposed Plan Change 7 (Water Permits) to the Water Plan (PC7) was prepared by ORC to manage applications for replacement water permits and deemed permits until a fit for purpose pl...

8. Regulatory Impact Statement Fee regime for the alcohol licensing system [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...provide a benchmark against which TA-set fees can be compared. This will help meet the objective of recovery of costs that are reasonable and relate only to administering the licensing system. 29. Some fees, such as those for manager’s certificates, appeals to ARLA, and extracts from the register should continue to be set centrally. In the case of ARLA costs, this is because ARLA is a national tribunal funded through central government. For manager’s certificates, a nationally con...

9. [2007] NZEmpC CC 21/07 Gorrie Fuel (SI) Ltd v Gittoes [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...resignation ought to be regarded as a constructive dismissal and that this dismissal was unjustifiable. In deciding whether the circumstances of this case gave rise to constructive dismissal, I am guided by the principles enunciated by the Court of Appeal in Auckland Electric Power Board v Auckland Provincial District Local Authorities Officers IUOW [1994] 1 ERNZ 168 where, at page 172, they said: In such a case as this we consider that the first relevant question is whether the...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 179 Drader v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...defendant’s confidential records, obtained an unlisted phone number, went into a private interview room and made a telephone call which the plaintiff conceded, on at least two occasions, amounted to a threat. [77] Ms Turner cited the Court of Appeal’s decision in Chief Executive of the Department of Inland Revenue v Buchanan (No 2), 12 where it was held that a breach by an employee of an employer’s policies and procedures contained in a code of conduct, may justify a dis...