Search Results

1. Brown v Brown - Tuhuna 12A1 (2025) 292 Taitokerau MB 147 (292 TTK 147) [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...principles concerning the grant of a permanent injunction are summarised in the Māori Appellate Court decision of Meroiti v Meroiti:3 2 Taueki v Horowhenua Sailing Club – Horowhenua 11 (Lake) Block (2014) Māori Appellate Court MB 60 (2014 APPEAL 60). 3 Meroiti v Meroiti [2025] Māori Appellate Court MB 142 (2025 APPEAL 142) at [32]. 292 Taitokerau MB 154 (a) The Court must be satisfied that the grant of the injunction will not cause disproportionate hardship. (b) The...

2. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 v H [2013] NZLCDT 7 [pdf, 222 KB]

   SUPPRESSION ORDER MADE ON APPEAL NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2013] NZLCDT 7 LCDT 021/12 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN WAIKATO BAY OF PLENTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE NO 1 AND H CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr G McKenzie Ms C Rowe Ms S Sage Mr W Smith DATE OF HEARING at Auckland 28 February 2013 APPEARANCES Mr L Clancy for...

3. National Standards Committee 1 v Peters [2019] NZLCDT 39 [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...conduct and thus this question would be answered affirmatively. Issue 3 – Continuation of Interim Suppression Order [45] We accept the submission of both counsel that wider publication ought not to occur until the trial is concluded and all appeal rights exhausted. When there is an adverse finding about a practitioner’s conduct involving the media the Tribunal should be careful to protect against its decision repeating the conduct until the matters of concern are concluded....

4. Martin, G N - EiC (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...reinforcing, to all parties involved, that the focus needs to be on the long-term planning framework that will sit in the LWRP, rather than unduly focusing resources into the WPPC. [71] There is a significant risk of the proposed plan change being appealed to the Environment Court if the Minister for the Environment does not call in the proposal. There are limited opportunities to mitigate this, however the messaging as for the above point is that resources are best focused on the long-te...

5. Evaluation of Legal Aid providers survey [pdf, 897 KB]

   ...practitioner 67% 33% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Practising on your own account An employee 21% 16% 28% 21% 14% 0% 10% 20% 30% Up to 5 years 6–10 years 11–20 years 21–30 years More than 30 years 1% 4% 5% 90% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%100% Court of Appeal / Supreme Court High Court Family Court / other District Court LEGAL AID PROVIDERS SURVEY: OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2011 Page 22 H E A D E R – E V E N P A G E H e a d in g 2 – E v e n p a g e Fig...

6. Atkins & Ors as Trustees of the Bruce Family Trust v North Shore City Council [pdf, 284 KB]

   claim-01505.doc Claim No: 1505 Under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 In the matter of an adjudication claim And Peter Bruce Frederick Atkins, Peter Bruce Frederick Atkins and John Richard Muller as trustees of The Bruce Family Trust Claimants And North Shore City Council First respondent And Grant Williams Second respondent And Jason Williams Third respondent And Grant Williams and Jason Williams and Desmond Sarjant Williams as trustee

7. [2020] NZEnvC 024 Panuku Developments Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Counsel: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 02-4- of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent R Peters and R Bannan R Dexter and A Modrow N Smith P Lange L Whiley s 27 4 parties Environment...

8. [2012] NZEmpC 79 Premier Events Group Ltd v Beattie [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...of Police, 15 the Court accepted that there was a continuing cause of action in respect of actions taken by the employer against the plaintiff. This included actions which were four years apart. The Court commented, relying on the Court of Appeal decision in Minister of Education v Bailey, 16 that: “it 10 CC 23/07, 19 November 2007. 11 At [6]. 12 [2002] 1 ERNZ 720. 13 At [33]. 14 At [32]. 15 [2003] 1 ER...

9. [2008] NZEmpC CC 9/08 Coffey v The Christchurch Press, a division of Fairfax NZ Ltd [pdf, 70 KB]

   ...to the effect that summary dismissal should be reserved for the most serious kinds of misconduct which go to the root of the employment contract so as to destroy it all together or to render it impossible of continuation. The Court of Appeal in Northern Distribution Union v BP Oil New Zealand Ltd [1992] 3 ERNZ 483 at 487, when referring to conduct that deeply impairs or is destructive of the basic confidence or trust that is an essential of the employment relationship, we...

10. [2006] NZEmpC CC 13/06 Angel & Anor v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...process. The key question was whether the actions of the plaintiffs were capable of constituting serious misconduct. The Authority held that the matter was one of negligence and relied on W & H Newspapers Limited v Oram1 where the Court of Appeal held that a single act of carelessness when sufficiently serious can impair trust and confidence. [6] Having found that the employees had breached the integrity of the product safety systems the Authority held that their actions wer...