Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 012 Ngati Paoa Trust Board v Kennedy Point Boatharbour Limited [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...and the Trust Board's status as a "not for profit" charitable entity. [16] I acknowledge that such factors may be relevant to some extent in a costs claim, however they cannot offer a complete shield. As previously held, bringing an appeal in the public interest does not exempt a party from a costs award, and a party's status as a "community group" does not absolve it from liability for costs.8 I do not accept these factors in this case. Costs on the de...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 44 Courage v Attorney-General [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...135, [2017] 1 NZLR 310 at [2] in relation to the principle generally; and, in relation to access to Court documents, see the discussion in Commissioner of Police v Doyle [2017] NZHC 3049; and Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2017] NZHC 3026 upheld on appeal in Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2018] NZCA 460. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2017/0193/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM7379817&DLM7379817 http://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2017/0193/latest/link.aspx?id=D...

3. [2012] NZREADT 62A - Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 10063) v Sant Raj (31 July 2012) [pdf, 114 KB]

   ...circumstances stated therein I cease to be the licensed salesperson member of REAA. Having regard to this fact REAA is not obliged to lay charges on me. Furthermore there is no READT number decision of CAC dated 20 March 2012 and the right of appeal provide 20 working days after the date of notice whereas the letter from REAA dated 20 March 2012 under response to charge allows 10 working days from receiving the letter. These are matters of concern which need addressing, why both l...

4. [2023] NZEmpC 84 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...135, [2017] 1 NZLR 310 at [2] in relation to the principle generally; and, in relation to access to Court documents, see the discussion in Commissioner of Police v Doyle [2017] NZHC 3049; and Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2017] NZHC 3026 upheld on appeal in Berry v Crimson Consulting Ltd [2018] NZCA 460, [2019] NZAR 30. be limited; during the substantive hearing, open justice has greater weight than at other stages of the proceeding and greater weight in relation to documents...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 183 Jindal v RKM Smith Enterprises Ltd [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...the property of the person in default be sequestered. [9] Mr Mathews, who appeared for Ms Jindal, concentrated his submissions on having RKM fined pursuant to s 140(6)(d).6 He drew attention to the assessment factors referred to by the Court of Appeal in Peter Reynolds Mechanical Ltd v Denyer (Labour Inspector): the nature of the default (whether it is deliberate or wilful), whether it is repeated, without excuse or explanation, and whether it is ongoing.7 Account also has to be t...

6. Expression-of-interest-District-Court-Judge-2024 [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...indicate, by ticking the boxes, the extent of your experience, both civil and criminal, in the following: Court Civil Criminal Details, including number of appearances Supreme Court ______________________________________ Court of Appeal ______________________________________ Court Civil Criminal Details, including total years’ experience High Court Appellant work ______________________________________ High Court ________...

7. MOJ0120-PRINT.pdf [pdf, 764 KB]

   ...courts and tribunals You have the right to speak Māori in courts and tribunals. This right is stated in the Māori Language Act 1987. This means that you can speak Māori in any legal proceedings at the following: • Supreme Court • Court of Appeal • High Court • District Court • Family Court • Youth Court • Employment Court • Māori Land Court • Māori Appellate Court • Coroners Court • Environment Court • Employment Relations Authority (ERA)...

8. DCJ EOI Form [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...indicate, by ticking the boxes, the extent of your experience, both civil and criminal, in the following: Court Civil Criminal Details, including number of appearances Supreme Court ______________________________________ Court of Appeal ______________________________________ Court Civil Criminal Details, including total years’ experience High Court Appellant work ______________________________________ High Court ________...

9. [2025] NZEmpC 80  AJY v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...submitted that the judgment’s reference to retirement benefits includes any entitlement to retiring leave under the collective agreement. He submitted that if Corrections wishes to raise concerns about pleadings and evidence, it should file an appeal. [6] The reference to retirement benefits in the extracts of the judgment set out above covered not only employer contributions to retirement savings but also retirement leave if AJY could reasonably have been expected to have obtai...

10. [2025] NZREADT 28 – Vargas Cobos v REAA (22 July 2025) [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...the CPD requirements by the deadline. OUTCOME [25] The application is dismissed and the Registrar’s decision is confirmed. [26] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. 6 Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s 154. 7 Section 37(1)(d). 6 PUBLICATION [27] Having regard to the interests of the public in knowing the status of licensees and also the Tribunal’s jurisprudence, b...