Search Results

1. Barlow v Phillips - Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and other blocks (2012) 282 Aotea MB 75 (282 AOT 75) [pdf, 419 KB]

   BARLOW V PHILLIPS MLC 282 Aotea MB 75 [3 May 2012] IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 282 Aotea MB 75 (282 AOT 75) A20080015133 UNDER Section 238 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and other Blocks (Manu Ariki Marae) BETWEEN FAITH BARLOW AND BEVERLY MURAAHI Applicants AND TEINA PHILLIPS First Respondent AND TE KOTAHITANGA SOCIETY INCORPORATED Second Respondent AND WAITUHI

2. [2010] NZEmpC 84 Secretary for Justice v Dodd [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...specific that little of value can be taken from them. An exception, however, is the litigation in which relevant principles were restated, which began in the Employment Relations Authority, progressed to this Court,3 continued in the Court of Appeal,4 and went to the Supreme Court in Buchanan v Chief Executive of the Department of Inland Revenue.5 [48] In Buchanan, two employees with otherwise unblemished service whose duties included accessing confidential computerised informatio...

3. [2012] NZEmpC 153 Hayllar v The Goodtime Food Co Ltd [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...them out had been “pre-determined”. [12] The difficulty with the pleadings and submissions relating to these matters is that they deal with issues which are not part of the unjustified dismissal grievance before the Court. As the Court of Appeal noted in Waikato District Health Board v 3 [2011] NZERA Wellington 149 at [5]. Clear, 4 s 114(1) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) provides that a personal grievance...

4. PR v HG 69/2016 LCRO [pdf, 269 KB]

   LCRO 69/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN PR Applicant AND HG Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms PR has applied for a review of a decision by the [City] Standards Committee [X] which determined

5. LCRO 98/2019 EL v SV, DV & JV (31 March 2021) [pdf, 510 KB]

   ...scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act):11 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

6. DV, RL, YS and TB v AR LCRO 316/2013 [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...Scope of Review [34] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:2 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

7. Brooking v Henderson - Wharekahika A47 (2022) 110 Tairawhiti MB 238 (110 TRW 238) [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...dense and prolific. As His Honour Judge Stone has noted in relation to the previous s 240:11 [8] There are several superior court authorities regarding the principles applicable to the serious step of removal of trustees. They include the Court of Appeal judgments Rameka v Hall and Naera v Fenwick, and the Māori Appellate Court decision of Perenara v Pryor. [9] These authorities support the following general propositions: (a) removal is a serious step and is not undertaken l...

8. LCRO 201/2021 DK obo The LK Estate v BY and FM (31 July 2023) [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...scope of review [50] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:6 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

9. Regulatory Impact Assessments

   ...of Justice. It provides analysis of options to reform and modernise criminal procedure developed by the Criminal Procedure (Simplification) Project. October 2010. RIA - Criminal Procedure Simplification Regulatory Impact Assessment: Fee for lodging appeals to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal The Ministry is tasked with the setting of an appropriate fee for the lodging of appeals to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (IPT). October 2010. RIA - Fee for lodging appeals to the Immigrat...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Regulatory stewardship

10. [2010] NZEmpC 39 Lewis v Howick College Board of Trustees [pdf, 23 KB]

    ...acceptance. There was, for example, an earlier Calderbank offer made to Mr Lewis in May 2008 when the Board’s solicitors believed he was advised by a senior and experienced employment law practitioner but which offer was rejected. [14] The Court of Appeal has counselled the Employment Court to be “steely” in relation to Calderbank offers.3 [15] In these circumstances, I consider that Mr Lewis should not be entitled to reimbursement of any costs incurred after his refusal of...