Search Results

1. Ringwood v Auckland Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 44 [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...and care. The position remains however that under the Building Act, the breach of this duty by act or omission must occur within 10 years of proceedings being brought. [71] All three counsel referred to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Johnson v Watson.7 Again, this case concerned the tortious liability of a builder rather than a developer. In Johnson v Watson Tipping J stated that an act or omission occurs on a particular day and that the starting point of the s...

2. MLC 2017 August Outstanding OCR Applications [pdf, 345 KB]

   ...made at 103 Wairoa MB 244-245 on 11 July 2001 - Application to the Chief Judge A20170004176 58/93 Wero Karena Omahu 4C Section 6 - and an order for confirmation of alienation made at 56 Takitimu MB 233-237 (8 February 2017) - Notice of Appeal and Leave to Appeal Out of Time (Respondents Douglas Whitfield and Mark Alexander) A20170004320 45/93 Toni Ngahiriwa Welsh, John Ernest Welsh Talbot Venus Talbot (nee Welsh) or Venus Tawera Werehi or Whetumarama Welsh - and a...

3. Apostolakis v Rennie (Strike-Out Application) 2017 NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...and 105 of the Human Rights Act. Section 105 requires the Tribunal “to act according to the substantial merits of the case, without regard to technicalities”. That section applies, with necessary modifications, to decisions of this Court on appeal against a decision of the Tribunal: s123(5). [46] The Tribunal has an express power to dismiss proceedings, if satisfied that they are frivolous, vexatious or not brought in good faith: s115. As Mr Laurenson points out, the Tribunal del...

4. LD & KL Trust v MT & HB LCRO 25/2015 (15 April 2016) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...within the prescription of a “mild 19 Letter JK to LCRO (8 April 2016). 20 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, s 156(1)(d). 11 criticism”. In support of this I refer to the Court of Appeal decision in NZLS v B where the Court said:21 A censure or reprimand, however expressed, is likely to be of particular significance in this context because it will be taken into account in the event of a further complaint against the pract...

5. [2016] NZEmpC 167 Labour Inspector v Tech 5 Recruitment Ltd [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...any authority to support that proposition, although it did draw on a reference to a premium for the grant of a lease as being a common example of what is meant by that word in a similar context. This Court’s judgment in Sears was overturned on appeal but not on this point. [34] Developing that proposition from Sears, Ms Dyhrberg moved on to discuss consideration. She referred to Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v Selfridge & Co Ltd 8 and Attorney-General for England and Wales v...

6. Reihana - Estate of Ngapipi Rewiti Panapa [2017] Chief Judge's MB 238 (2017 CJ 238) [pdf, 505 KB]

   ...1963 at 24 Tauranga MB 311-312, 24 Tauranga MB 322-323 and 25 Tauranga MB 50. 7 Tau v Nga Whanau o Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX Block [2010] Maori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167) at [61]. 2017 Chief Judges MB 252 [26] I accept the applicants’ evidence that Thomas and Raymond Reihana were not aware of the failure to include them as successors to the Estate of Ngāpipi Rewiti Panapa, and that expla...

7. Nixon v Attorney-General [2018] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...other relationships, making already complex calculations even more so. Mr Hogan stated that apportionment would likely result in increased errors in entitlement calculations which would likely cause MSD to be subject to an increase in reviews and appeals. Issue one – the absence of an assessment in respect of Mr Nixon under s 70B(3) [43] The Crown submitted that Mr Nixon’s claim regarding the discriminatory effect of s 70B(3) on himself must fail because he has never applied...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 47 New Zealand Nurses Organisation v Waikato District Health Board [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...applied for recall and/or a rehearing of its separate challenge, arguing that it was entitled to a ruling on the matters of interpretation raised. A rehearing was granted by former Chief Judge Colgan in his judgment dated 12 July 2016.6 WDHB appealed that decision to the Court of Appeal but was unsuccessful.7 [14] This rehearing of NZNO’s challenge proceeds on the basis of the evidence heard by Judge Ford and the further submissions from the parties and intervener.8 [15] The c...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 66 Smartlift Systems Ltd v Armstrong [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...Authority erred legally or factually in considering the adequacy of consultation. [25] The Authority reminded itself of two leading decisions as to redundancy. First, Grace Team Accounting Ltd v Brake.12 The Authority noted that the Court of Appeal found that if an employer could show a redundancy was genuine in that the notice and consultation requirements of s 4 of the Act had been duly complied with, that could be expected to go a long way towards satisfying the s 103A test....

10. MLC 2017 July Outstanding OCR Applications [pdf, 345 KB]

    ...made at 103 Wairoa MB 244-245 on 11 July 2001 - Application to the Chief Judge A20170004176 58/93 Wero Karena Omahu 4C Section 6 - and an order for confirmation of alienation made at 56 Takitimu MB 233-237 (8 February 2017) - Notice of Appeal and Leave to Appeal Out of Time (Respondents Douglas Whitfield and Mark Alexander) A20170004320 45/93 Toni Ngahiriwa Welsh, John Ernest Welsh Talbot Venus Talbot (nee Welsh) or Venus Tawera Werehi or Whetumarama Welsh - and a...