Search Results

1. [2017] EmpC 92 P v A [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...right to an extension of time which would defeat the purpose of the rules which is to provide a time table for the conduct of litigation. [12] I also have regard to the general principle summarised by Richmond J in Avery v No 2 Public Service Appeal Board [1973] 2 NZLR 86 at 91: When once an appellant allows the time for appealing to go by then his position suffers a radical change. Whereas previously he was in a position to appeal as of right, he now becomes an applicant for a...

2. [2019] NZEnvC 072 Wilson v Canterbury Regional Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 72 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal against an abatement notice pursuant to section 325 of the Act G RWILSON (ENV-2019-CHC-001 3) Appellant CANTERBURY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 12 April 2019 Date of Issue: 12 April 2019 PROCEDURAL D...

3. MC v N Ltd [2025] NZDT 171 (30 April 2025) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Please also note that you cannot appeal a rehearing outcome, only the original decision itself. As a result, any appeal filed at the conclusion of the rehearing process would be out of time, involves a further application for leave to appeal and is at risk of not being accepte...

4. [2016] NZSSAA 032 (20 April 2016) [pdf, 34 KB]

   [2016] NZSSAA 032 Reference No. SSA 074/15 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Auckland against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member DECISION ON THE PAPERS Introduction [1] The appellant appeals against a decision of the Chief Executive upheld by a Benefits Review Co...

5. Mercury NZ Limited 101.pdf [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...Wellington Christchurch In the Environment Court of New Zealand at Auckland I mua i te Kōti Taiao o Aotearoa I te rohe o Tāmaki Makaurau ENV-2020-AKL-000101 under: the Resource Management Act 1991 in the matter of: an appeal pursuant to clause 14(1) of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 between: Auckland/Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Councils Appellant and: Waikato Regional Council Respondent 100423514/8079350...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 064 Muir v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 6.3 MB]

   ...MUIR & BEECH COTTAGE TRUSTEES LIMITED v QLDC – PDP Consent Order IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 64 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN KEN MUIR (ENV-2021-CHC-27) BEECH COTTAGE TRUSTEES LIMITED (ENV-2021-CHC-58) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Ha...

7. Robinson v ACC [2012] NZACA 12 [pdf, 637 KB]

   ...under the Accident Compensation Act 2001, and gave the right of review under that Act. The Reviewer accepted jurisdiction under Part 5 of the 2001 Act and awarded costs under the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation and Compensation (Review Costs and Appeals) Regulations 2002 (the Regulations) and gave the right of appeal to both O.l>lftims;:-.... 2 [4] The appeal was heard in two parts, the first dealing with the jurisdiction of the Authority to determine the appeal, and the second...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 076 Vernon v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 730 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 076 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of appeals under clause 14 of Schedule 1 to the Act relating to the proposed Thames­ Coromandel District Plan in relation to the Coastal Environment and Natural Character Topics BETWEEN KEITH VERNON (ENV-2016-AKL-000084) AND AND AND Others (listed overleaf) Appellants THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT PLAN Respondent...

9. Nabi & Fang v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 403) & Ors [2016] NZREADT 80 [pdf, 137 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 80 READT 018/16 UNDER THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS ACT 2008 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 111 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ANEEZ NABI & JIAJING FANG Applicants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 403) First respondent AND MICHAEL ZHOU & TINA SHI Second respondents Tribunal: Ms K Davenport QC − Chairperson Mr J Gaukrodger – Member M...

10. UN v BF Ltd [2022] NZDT 138 (6 September 2022) [pdf, 211 KB]

    ...required to park in this car park. He did not have one, and he was unable to discover how to acquire one. He stayed in the car park for 54 minutes, sitting in his vehicle. 2. BF Ltd issued UN with a parking breach notice dated 5 May 2022, which UN appealed against on 25 May 2022. BF Ltd refused his appeal, although UN says that he did not receive this communication. UN appealed again on 10 June 2022, 13 June 2022 and 14 June 2022. BF Ltd responded to and refused each of these appeals....