Search Results

1. Te-Au-Reka-Capability-Model_October-2022.pdf [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...access reference material from within the solution to support the making of judicial decisions. Refer matters to another court Judicial officers can direct that a matter be heard next in a different location or a different jurisdiction. Where an appeal is lodged, court information from the lower court can be transferred to the appellate court. Record event information Judicial officers and registry can record information relating to events ensuring a complete court record, effectiv...

2. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burton [2023] NZLCDT 23 (26 May 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...“non-compliance with disciplinary orders is generally a significant matter”, citing Parlane 1 and Hart.2 [13] Mr Schwarcz referred us to three cases where orders had been breached and suspension imposed as a consequence.3 In the Hong matter, on appeal a suspension of four months was imposed (reducing the Tribunal ordered suspension of 10 months). In Kennelly, two months suspension was imposed on a practitioner with a number of previous disciplinary findings against him. In Na...

3. 2024-07-05-Notice-of-Hearing-King-Shag.pdf [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/environment-court EC4180_NoticeOfHearing SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS pMEP: King Shag ENV-2024-324-000001 Friends of Nelson Haven & Tasman Bay (Inc) v Marlborough District Council Appeal By Submitter On Proposed Policy Statement Or Plan pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 Court Reference: ENV-2020-CHC-000033 1. i. Topic:

4. A-Certificate-of-Approval-Application-form_2024.pdf [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...section 65 of the Land Transport Act 1998, or an earlier equivalent provision? Yes No Have you ever been ordered by a New Zealand court to be imprisoned following conviction for an offence and that conviction or order has not been quashed on appeal? Yes No In the last 7 years, have you ever been convicted by a New Zealand court of an offence under the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 or Private Investigators and Security Guards Act 1974 for wor...

5. Twigley v New Zealand Law Society [2025] NZLCDT 5 (28 January 2025) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...version from that made by Mr Twigley less than 12 months previously, which we declined. 1 Contained in the Order of that date, which is repeated at the end of this decision. 2 Twigley v New Zealand Law Society [2023] NZLCDT 28 (upheld on appeal). 3 …For cultural and historical reasons, redemption and forgiveness are important attributes of the shared morality of our society … in part it derives from the self-interest which any community has to encourage the rehabilitation o...

6. A-Certificate-of-Approval-Application-form 2024 - Updated Form 20240927.pdf [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...section 65 of the Land Transport Act 1998, or an earlier equivalent provision? Yes No Have you ever been ordered by a New Zealand court to be imprisoned following conviction for an offence and that conviction or order has not been quashed on appeal? Yes No In the last 7 years, have you ever been convicted by a New Zealand court of an offence under the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 or Private Investigators and Security Guards Act 1974 for wor...

7. File other applications

   ...to seek legal advice before and during such a proceeding.  If you bring a judicial review proceeding you are called the applicant, and the person or body whose actions are being reviewed is called the respondent If you have the right to appeal or challenge a decision, you need to have already done this before you filed an application for judicial review. Time limit No time limit is prescribed for this application by the Employment Court Regulations but it may be prescribed by som...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Apply to the Employment Court >
   3. File a challenge

8. [2025] NZLCDT 28 National Standards Committee 2 v Tennet (16 June 2025) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...the public in the future. [13] We also refer to the previous finding of misconduct against Mr Tennet, by a previous Tribunal in 2023. We note that that misconduct, for which Mr Tennet was suspended for twelve months (reduced to nine months on appeal), involved a direct breach of trust to a client. While we accept that the current matters are more appropriately classified as “sins of omission”, the overall consequences are much more serious than in the previous misconduct. [1...

9. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Parlane [2010] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...the profession in terms of its reputation and integrity. [25] Mr Parlane has a previous disciplinary record. Mr Parlane attempted to explain it away on the basis that the earlier disciplinary decisions were wrong, or that he only withdrew his appeals relating to findings against him in respect of 1 Section 3 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 6 those charges because he did not want to prolong matters. The matters occurred some...

10. Legal Complaints Review Officer v Denee [2011] NZLCDT 6 [pdf, 74 KB]

    ...occurred prior to the commencement of the Act. This was $2,000 and in addition it censured the practitioner and ordered the payment of costs of $3,230. The Standards Committee declined to publish the name of the practitioner. The complainant appealed the Standards Committee decision to the Legal Complaints Review Officer who, on 21 July 2010 gave a decision pursuant to sections 211(b) and 152(2) of the Act that the matter be referred to the Tribunal. Pursuant to section 212 char...