Search Results

Search results for appeal.

14337 items matching your search terms

McFetridge v Tapsell - Succession to Taa Tapsell [2025] Chief Judge's MB 425 (2025 CJ 425) [pdf, 254 KB]

...the order? 3 Ashwell – Rawinia or Lavinia Ashwell (nee Russell) [2009] Chief Judge’s MB 209 (2009 CJ 209) at [15]. 4 Tau v Nga Whanau O Morven & Glenavy – Waihao 903 Section IX Block [2010] Māori Appellate Court MB 167 (2010 APPEAL 167). 5 Inia v Julian [2020] NZCA 423 at [10]. 2025 Chief Judge's MB 432 Was an error made? [30] Mr Bidois submitted that this was effectively an application for a rehearing pursuant to s 43 of the Act but no leave to appl...
Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 v Leach [2024] NZLCDT 27 (30 August 2024) [pdf, 168 KB]

...documents produced at any hearing: (c) an order prohibiting the publication of the name or any particulars of the affairs of the person charged or any other person. (2) Unless it is reversed or modified in respect of its currency by the High Court on appeal under section 253, an order made under subsection (1) continues in force until such time as may be specified in the order, or, if no time is specified, until the Disciplinary Tribunal, in its discretion, revokes it on the application...
3-Strikes-Proactive-Release-OIA-Requests_Final_Part3.pdf [pdf, 13 MB]

... Section 3 o Delivering an option: we’re waiting on feedback from Police, Corrections and Crown Law on their implementation activities and costs. We are engaging with internal staff and Crown Law on the litigation costs of criminal and civil appeals . Looking forward to discussing the RIA with you. Ngā mihi, Chinwe Akomah (she/her) Senior Advisor | Sentencing and Rehabilitation Criminal Justice policy Ministry of Justice | Tāhū o te Ture L6 Justice Centr...
Wild v Ministry for Primary Industries (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 239 KB]

...dealt with in accordance with s 98 of the Privacy Act 2020. Section 98 is not a mere technicality. It limits the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to matters that have been dealt with by the Privacy Commissioner in the manner it prescribes. As the Court of Appeal confirmed in Guo v Culpan, s 105 does not allow the scope of proceedings in the Tribunal to be expanded beyond their proper limits.9 [16] Nor does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to review whether the Privacy Commissioner’s inves...
[2024] NZEmpC 254 Rookes v Tillmans Fine Furniture Ltd [pdf, 230 KB]

...Alternatively, a challenge may be about part of the determination, specifying any errors of fact or law alleged to have been made.11 The Act and Employment Court Regulations 2000 do not provide for what may be called in other jurisdictions a cross-appeal (or cross-challenge), enabling a defendant to respond with a challenge that would otherwise be out of time. [21] Tillmans’ challenge was limited, crafted so that it preserved those parts of the determination where it succeeded...
LCRO 1/2023 EL v OX (17 December 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

...his fees as modest, and rejects any suggestion that they should be refunded. Nature and scope of review [32] The High Court has described a review by this Office in the following way:8 A review by the LCRO is neither a judicial review nor an appeal. Those seeking a review of a Committee determination are entitled to a review based on the LCRO’s own opinion rather than on deference to the view of the Committee. A review by the LCRO is informal, inquisitorial and robust. It invol...
[2024] NZEmpC 253 Johnston v Te Whatu Ora - Health New Zealand [pdf, 233 KB]

...to be the arbiter of fact in the first instance. [37] Mr Russell also submitted that the Court should only become involved after the Authority has investigated the matter. I accept that removal will lead to the loss of an automatic right of appeal through the loss of the right to challenge. However, that is a matter that affects both parties equally and is a neutral factor for the purposes of this assessment. Further, it is an outcome that is specifically contemplated by the Act...
2016 archive

...sexual violation cases where more than two complainants allege a sexual violation offence against the aided person are now an automatic inclusion criteria the case plan has been shortened, questions are clearer and more relevant a new case plan for HCC appeal cases has been developed. The HCC webpage has been updated to reflect these changes From 1 April 2016 all new cases entering into the HCC framework should use the updated case plans. It is not mandatory to transition existing cases on to...
Located in:
Appearing in court - what you need to know

...will be required to stand whenever the judge enters or leaves the courtroom. A judge of the High Court must be addressed as Your Honour, Sir (male) or Ma’am (female). If you want to refer to another judge: a judge of the High Court, Court of Appeal or Supreme Court is referred to as Justice [Surname] a judge of the District Court is referred to as Judge [Surname] Anyone addressing a judge, or being spoken to by a judge, should stand up. Don’t interrupt when the judge is speaking. It...
Located in:
2017 Decisions of public interest

...disparity surveyed – “truly parallel circumstances” considered – analysis of disparity case-specific – standard of “sufficient similarity” – strike-out application dismissed - whether orders for discovery should be stayed pending outcome of appeal – orders stayed. [2017] NZEmpC 95 Fraser v McDonalds and Doran v Carrick (Judgment of the Full Court, 4 August 2017) SECTION 67D AVAILABILITY PROVISION – whether ‘flexible shift’ arrangement was availability clause – IEAs inc...
Located in:

Pages