14337 items matching your search terms
...referred back to the appeal courts. The CRCC is an independent Crown entity. It is funded by the Crown but is independent of Government or Ministerial control. Any person who considers they have been wrongly convicted or sentenced (and has used their appeals) can apply to the CCRC to have their case reviewed. Backpocket Q&A – Criminal Cases Review Commission Document 3 24 s9(2)(g)(i) RE LE AS ED U ND ER T HE O FF IC IA L IN FO RM AT IO N AC T 19 82...
SMITH & SILK v CCC – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 86 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s 120 of the Act BETWEEN P SMITH AND C SILK (ENV-2021-CHC-84) Appellants AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J E Borthwick – sitting alone under s 279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Order: 25 May 202...
ISSN 1175 - 8120 (Print) ISSN 2463-3763 (Online) www.mäorilandcourt.govt.nz www.mäorilandonline.govt.nz SEPTEMBER | MAHURU 2022 The purpose of the National Pänui / Te Pänui ä Motu is to provide notice to interested parties of hearings being conducted in, and applications received by, the Mäori Land Court. Only applications and sittings that were confirmed at the time of this publication are listed. For more information, please contact your local Mäori Land Court office. Indivi
Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Section 223 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 Report of the LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER For the 12 months ended 30 June 2011 Annual Report 2011 | Legal Complaints Review Officer 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ___________________________________________________________________________________________ LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICE Overview of the year 2009/2010 ........................................
...to the conclusions contained therein. The decision in the present case to admit in evidence the judgment of Asher J is therefore supported by authority. [13] On the question of weight, it must be noted that while Mr Slater was granted leave to appeal against the decision of Asher J (see Slater v Blomfield [2015] NZCA 240), he was also required to pay security for costs by 28 August 2015. An application by Mr Slater for leave to adduce further evidence was dismissed in Slater v Blomfiel...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KITAMAKIMAKAURAU IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC f 1-'t of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for enforcement orders pursuant toss 314 and 316 of the Act HAMIL TON CITY COUNCIL (ENV-2019-AK-000319) Applicant GLOBAL METAL SOLUTIONS LIMITED First Respondent CRAIG VERNON TUHORO Second Respondent Court: Environment Judge M Harland Environme
I N C O N F I D E N C E 1 I N C O N F I D E N C E In Confidence Office of the Minister of Justice Office of the Associate Minister of Justice Cabinet Social Outcomes Committee Regulatory Systems (Justice) Amendment Bill Package: Policy Proposals Proposal 1 We seek agreement to amend legislation that impacts the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry’s) regulatory systems through a package of four associated bills: 1.1 the Regulatory Systems (Courts Improvement) Amendment Bi
...issue. To advise a client that if an issue was to be the subject of possible disciplinary action, the allegation must be raised and the client given the opportunity to respond would be incontestably trite law in accordance with the classic Court of Appeal decision in Auckland City Council v Hennessey. 13 [33] I give this hypothetical example only to demonstrate that, in the absence of clear evidence that a solicitor’s advice is pivotal, disqualification should not follow. [34...
...confers a broad discretion on the Court but, as with all such discretions, it must be exercised judicially and in accordance with principle. The key principles applicable to the Court’s discretion to award costs have been set out by the Court of Appeal in three very well known decisions: Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305, Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd [2002] 1 ERNZ 438 and Health Waikato Ltd v Elmsly [2004] 1 ERNZ 172. [8] The fundamental purpose of an...
...from engaging in unlawful conduct. [29] Taking a purposive approach to s97, it should be interpreted to prevent employers from avoiding the economic consequences of strike or lockout action in all but certain specified respects. As the Court of Appeal noted in Carter Holt Harvey Ltd v National Distribution Union Inc [2002] 1 ERNZ 239, 249: [30] … Section 97 imposes restrictions on the persons employers may employ or engage to do the work of striking or locked out workers. Althou...