Search Results

1. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Horsley [2014] NZLCDT 47 [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...relationship. 1 Daniels v Complaints Assessment Committee 2 of the Wellington District Law Society [2011] 3 NZLR 850. 4 [12] Mr Hodge referred us to a decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Law Society of New South Wales v McNamara.2 In that matter the Court held that the attempt to deceive the Law Society was serious enough, but the attempt to deceive the Statutory Committee (the equivalent of the Tribunal) was eve...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - He Whiritaunoka (Whanganui) chapter 28 [pdf, 857 KB]

   ...and occurred rarely. The fact that it took the Crown three decades from the time the Native Land Court was established – and the better part of two decades from the time the Native affairs Committee first high­ lighted the anomaly – to enable appeals as of right, was contrary to its duty to actively protect Māori interests. It was also contrary to its obligation (partly stemming from its undertakings in article 3 of the treaty) to enable Māori to seek reasonable redress for grieva...

3. [2022] NZEnvC 163 11 Cheshire Street Body Corporate v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...attached as Appendix B. 2 (2) the appeal is otherwise dismissed. B: Under section 285 of the Resource Management Act 1991, there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] On 11 June 2021, 11 Cheshire Street Body Corporate (CSBC) appealed Auckland Council’s decision of 20 May 2021 to grant resource consent to Summerset Villages (Parnell) Limited’s proposal for a retirement village at 23 and 41 Cheshire Street, Parnell. [2] CSBC appealed the Council’s d...

4. [2015] NZEmpC 57 Q v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 719 KB]

   Q v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 [7 May 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 57 CRC 8/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN Q Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: (26-30 January, 2-5 and 12-13 February 2015) (heard at Christchurch) Appearances: A Shaw, J Behrnes and M Dutkiewicz, co

5. ENV-2016-AKL-000193 Kiwi Property Group Limited & Others v Auckland Council Consent Order [pdf, 19 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 of an appeal under section 156(1) of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 KIWI PROPERTY GROUP LIMITED, KIWI PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED AND SYLVIA PARK BUSINESS CENTRE LIMITED (ENV-2016-AKL-000193) Appellants AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge L J Ne...

6. Adoption Action Inc v Attorney-General [2016] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 371 KB]

   ...representative capacity for an aggrieved person and that proceedings can be brought by a third party such as Adoption Action. [12] Before the Tribunal the Crown conceded Adoption Action has standing but reserved its position in relation to any potential appeal. [13] Adoption Action is candid that after years of unsuccessfully lobbying various Ministers and government administrations, these proceedings have been brought as a last resort to bring about change to the adoption law of New Z...

7. Common Bundle Volume 2 [pdf, 3.4 MB]

   20 Schedules CB305 S C H E D U L E S 20-2 Regional Plan: Water for Otago, updated to 1 July 2018 Table of Contents for Schedules 1 to 17 1. Schedule of natural and human use values of Otago’s surface water bodies ...........................................................................................................................4 1A Schedule of natural values .......................................................................6 1AA Schedule of Ota

8. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence - Ben Farrell [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   BI-309448-3-478-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2016-CHC-47 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF BEN FARRELL ____________________________________________________________ GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN LAWYERS DUNEDIN Solicitor on record: B Irving...

9. OIA-113021.pdf [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...tribunals Regulation Jurisdiction/administering agency If not Mlnlstrv of Justice 1. Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Regulations Copyright Tribunal (legislation administered by 2011 Ministry of Business. Innovation and Emoloyment) 2. Court of Appeal Fees Regulations 2001 3. Customs and Excise Regulations 1996 Customs Appeal Authority (legislation administered by New Zealand Customs Service) 4. Disoutes Tribunal Rules 1989 5. District Court Fees Reaulations 2009 6. District Co...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 234 Gazeley v Oceania Group (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 320 KB]

    ...… that the focus of the Court’s inquiry must be upon the employer’s actions and how the employer acted. The Court must be 7 [2011] ERNZ 207. The approach adopted by the Court was approved on appeal in Air Nelson Ltd v C [2011] NZCA 488. The Court of Appeal stated at [19] of its judgment: “Section 103A requires the Court to undertake an objective assessment both of the fairness and reasonableness of the procedure adopted by...